Real Asset Acquisition Corp
6 nominees · 3 ballot items.
Three management proposals: (1) approve the Business Combination Agreement to effect IQM’s business combination with RAAQ (ordinary resolution); (2) approve the Merger and Plan of Merger to merge RAAQ into Merger Sub (special resolution); and (3) adopt an Adjournment Proposal to allow the chairman to adjourn the meeting if needed; the RAAQ Board unanimously recommends voting FOR all three proposals.
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Real Asset Acquisition Corp’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot3
- 1
Business Combination Proposal
ManagementBoard: FORApprove and authorize, by ordinary resolution, the Business Combination Agreement dated February 22, 2026 among RAAQ, IQM, Merger Sub and ECLIPSE QC S.à r.l., including the IQM Capital Restructuring and the subsequent merger under which RAAQ will merge with and into Merger Sub and RAAQ Class A Ordinary Shares will be exchanged for IQM ADSs and RAAQ Warrants assumed by IQM.
More detail
This proposal asks RAAQ shareholders to approve and authorize, by ordinary resolution, the Business Combination Agreement dated February 22, 2026 among RAAQ, IQM, Merger Sub and ECLIPSE QC S.à r.l., which contemplates several pre-closing IQM internal capital restructuring steps and the immediate merger of RAAQ with and into Merger Sub with Merger Sub surviving as an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of IQM. Management seeks shareholder approval because shareholder consent is a legal and contractual closing condition to effecting the business combination and to enable the exchange mechanics by which each RAAQ Class A Ordinary Share will be cancelled and exchanged for the right to receive one IQM ADS and RAAQ Warrants will be assumed and converted into IQM Warrants. The Business Combination is cross‑conditioned with the Merger Proposal (a special resolution) and subject to customary closing conditions including minimum cash proceeds, regulatory filings, the effectiveness of the proxy/registration statement and Nasdaq listing approval for the IQM ADSs, so shareholder approval is necessary to advance the transaction. The Board’s public justification emphasizes IQM’s position as a leading full‑stack quantum computing company, its operational deliveries, experienced management and the long‑term market opportunity presented by quantum computing, which the Board concluded outweighed identified risks. Material governance context includes that the Sponsor and certain insiders hold approximately 25% of RAAQ and have agreed to vote in favor of the Business Combination and have waived redemption rights, creating potential conflicts of interest the Board considered when forming its recommendation. Financially, the combination will result in dilution to RAAQ public shareholders and a change in capital structure (ADS mechanics, assumed warrants, lock‑ups and registration rights) and the Board noted IQM’s historical losses and limited operating history as significant risks. The proposal is central to effecting the transaction and, if not approved, the related Merger Proposal will not be presented and the Business Combination cannot close; the Board therefore recommends voting FOR to enable the strategic combination while disclosing the risks and conflicts to shareholders.
- 2
Merger Proposal
ManagementBoard: FORApprove, by special resolution, the Merger and the Plan of Merger (substantially in the form attached as Annex B), pursuant to which RAAQ will merge with and into IQM US LLC (Merger Sub) with Merger Sub surviving the Merger as an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of IQM.
More detail
This proposal asks shareholders to approve, by special resolution (requiring at least a two‑thirds vote), the Merger and the Plan of Merger attached as Annex B, a legal instrument that effects the statutory merger of RAAQ into Merger Sub with Merger Sub surviving as a subsidiary of IQM. Management is seeking this approval because the Plan of Merger is the operative legal mechanism that consummates the structural component of the Business Combination — it implements the conversion, exchange and transfer mechanics whereby RAAQ’s public securities are exchanged for IQM ADSs and IQM assumes RAAQ warrants — and is therefore required by Cayman and Delaware corporate law to complete the transaction. The Merger Proposal is cross‑conditioned with the Business Combination Proposal (each is a condition precedent to the other), and its approval triggers statutory filings and steps under Cayman and Delaware law; the proxy includes the Plan of Merger as Annex B for shareholder review. The RAAQ Board unanimously recommends FOR, reiterating their view that the combined entity will capture an attractive market opportunity given IQM’s technology and commercial positioning, while also acknowledging risks including potential dilution, IQM’s historical losses and limited operating history. From a governance perspective, the Merger requires a higher vote threshold and is therefore the more difficult procedural hurdle; the filing notes that Sponsor and insiders’ voting commitments and presence at the meeting materially affect the likelihood of approval. The transaction will change the company’s capital structure and listing status — RAAQ securities will be delisted and IQM ADSs and warrants will be listed subject to Nasdaq approval — and shareholders should weigh these structural and regulatory implications alongside the strategic rationale. The Board’s recommendation is grounded in its assessment of IQM’s business prospects balanced against the transaction and regulatory conditions required to close.
- 3
Adjournment Proposal
ManagementBoard: FORAdopt an ordinary resolution authorizing the chairman to adjourn the extraordinary general meeting to a later date(s), if necessary or convenient, to permit further solicitation of proxies, to allow satisfaction or waiver of closing conditions, or to facilitate the Business Combination, the Merger or related transactions.
More detail
This proposal asks shareholders to authorize, by ordinary resolution, the chairman of the extraordinary general meeting to adjourn the meeting to a later date or dates to permit additional solicitation of proxies, to allow time to satisfy or waive closing conditions, or otherwise to facilitate completion of the Business Combination and related transactions. Management seeks this authority as a routine but practically important governance tool: because the Business Combination and Merger are cross‑conditioned on shareholder approvals and other closing conditions, an adjournment can be necessary to obtain the required vote counts or to address outstanding closing items without declaring the transaction failed. The Adjournment Proposal is not conditioned on the approval of any other proposal and requires only a simple majority to pass, giving the Board a tactical mechanism to extend the solicitation window if needed. The proxy materials make clear that, absent approval of the Business Combination Proposal, the Merger Proposal will not be presented, so adjournment authority primarily functions as a fallback to maximize the chance of satisfying those condition‑precedent proposals. While the adjournment power is standard, it can extend the timeline for shareholders, affect the timing of redemption rights and (to the extent insiders purchase shares to influence outcomes) could influence perceived fairness; the materials disclose insiders’ voting commitments and potential purchases. The Board recommends FOR because it views adjournment authority as necessary to avoid premature termination of the transaction for technical or timing reasons and to protect the prospect of closing if supplemental solicitations are required. Shareholders should weigh the procedural benefits of adjournment flexibility against the possibility of extended uncertainty and any potential conflicts arising from insider actions taken during any adjournment period.
Nominees on the ballot6
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fort Baker Capital Management LP | 7.5% | 1,719,359 | $18M |
| 2 | TENOR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT Co., L.P. | 5.4% | 1,250,000 | $13M |
| 3 | ARISTEIA CAPITAL, L.L.C. | 4.3% | 1,000,000 | $11M |
| 4 | AQR Arbitrage LLC | 3.5% | 805,182 | $8M |
| 5 | QVT Financial LPActivist | 3.3% | 762,685 | $8M |
| 6 | Magnetar Financial LLC | 3.3% | 750,000 | $8M |
| 7 | LMR Partners LLP | 2.6% | 595,317 | $6M |
| 8 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 2.5% | 582,146 | $6M |
| 9 | Alberta Investment Management Corp | 2.4% | 550,000 | $6M |
| 10 | TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP | 2.4% | 543,750 | $6M |
Other Industrials sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Real Asset Acquisition Corp’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Real Asset Acquisition Corp 2026 special meeting?
- Real Asset Acquisition Corp (RAAQ) holds its 2026 special shareholder meeting on Thursday, June 25, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Real Asset Acquisition Corp 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Real Asset Acquisition Corp 2026 meeting is Wednesday, June 3, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Real Asset Acquisition Corp's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 6 director nominees at the Real Asset Acquisition Corp 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Real Asset Acquisition Corp 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Real Asset Acquisition Corp 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.