Is the pay package earning its keep?
Say-on-pay support, outlier-pay tracking, and pay-for-performance alignment on every U.S. public company — layered with the fund-by-fund N-PX voting history behind each result and the peer-set context that says whether a package is defensible or a vote-risk.
7 days free · no credit card · an analyst sets you up
Every U.S. public company, every governance event, every business day.
A pay number means nothing without the vote and the peers.
Comp tables don't tell you if it's aligned.
$30M in total comp is either reasonable or egregious depending on performance and peers. The proxy gives you the number, not the judgment.
You can't see who actually voted how.
An 80% say-on-pay result hides the story. Which funds dissented, and why? Reconstructing that from N-PX filings by hand is a research project per name.
Vote-risk surfaces too late.
By the time a say-on-pay package is failing, the season is on top of you. You want the outlier and the dissent pattern before the meeting, not after.
Pay, performance, and the votes behind them.
Pay-for-performance alignment
Total comp set against return versus the S&P 500 and the peer set, so an outlier package is obvious — and so is a well-aligned one. Across every issuer, every year.
- Pay-vs-return alignment per executive and company
- Outlier-pay tracking against the peer group
- 25 years of compensation history
Say-on-pay with the fund-level vote
Issuer-level say-on-pay outcomes back to 2000, layered with Form N-PX disclosures showing how each mutual fund voted — drill from the result to per-fund ballot text and rationale.
- Say-on-pay support and outlier tracking, every issuer, every year
- N-PX fund-vote history with stated rationale
- Peer-set comparison and dissent benchmarking before the meeting
Built for the people who answer for governance.
Flag pay-for-performance breakdowns across the book.
Build the comp case with the dissent record to back it.
Stress-test a package against peers before the say-on-pay vote.
Benchmark proposals against how funds actually vote.
Common questions.
- How far back does the voting data go?
- Issuer-level say-on-pay and other vote outcomes go back to 2000, layered with Form N-PX fund-vote history on every standard and special proposal.
- Can I see how individual funds voted?
- Yes. Drill from a company-level say-on-pay result to per-fund ballot text and stated rationale, with peer-set and dissent benchmarking.
- How do you judge pay-for-performance?
- Total compensation is set against return versus the S&P 500 and the peer group over the period — a return-versus-benchmark comparison, not a risk-adjusted figure — so outliers and well-aligned packages both stand out.
- Is it available by API?
- Yes — say-on-pay, N-PX voting, and compensation data are available by REST API and bulk SFTP alongside the UI.
Put it on your own names.
Screen your real book this week.
Start a trial and run your actual portfolio through it — or bring a ticker to a 20-minute analyst demo first.
7 days free · no credit card · an analyst sets you up