Yext Inc
2 nominees · 4 ballot items.
Elect two Class III directors (Daniel Englander and Andrew Sheehan); ratify Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors; approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers (say-on-pay); and approve the amended, restated and extended 2016 Equity Incentive Plan.
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Yext Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot4
- 1
Election of Class III Directors
ManagementBoard: FORElect Daniel Englander and Andrew Sheehan as Class III directors to hold office until the 2029 annual meeting.
- 2
Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
ManagementBoard: FORRatify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Yext’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2027.
- 3
Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers
ManagementBoard: FORNon-binding advisory (say-on-pay) vote to approve the compensation of Yext’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement.
More detail
This proposal requests a non-binding, advisory shareholder vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement (the “say-on-pay” vote). Management seeks this advisory approval to obtain shareholder feedback on executive pay design and to validate that its pay-for-performance framework, mix of cash and equity, and use of performance-based awards align with shareholder interests. The proposal is not binding, but the Board and compensation committee state they will review and consider voting outcomes when setting future pay practices. Key contextual points include the Company’s emphasis on variable compensation (cash incentives tied to revenue and Adjusted EBITDA and performance-based RSUs/PSUs linked to ARR, Rule of 40 and rTSR), the compensation committee’s use of an independent consultant (Compensia), and the Company’s prior strong shareholder support (≈98% approval in 2025). Management argues the design balances retention, long-term alignment, and pay-for-performance while avoiding practices it describes as poor governance (e.g., no golden parachute tax gross-ups, limited single-trigger acceleration). Critics of typical say-on-pay proposals often point to misalignment between realized pay and performance or the opacity of performance targets; here, the filing discloses specific performance metrics and formulas (e.g., revenue and Adjusted EBITDA weightings for annual bonuses, ARR and Rule of 40 and rTSR for PSUs). Because the vote is advisory, its primary function is stewardship signaling: a strong adverse vote would likely trigger engagement and potential redesign of compensation elements, while strong support reinforces management’s current approach. For an analyst evaluating this item, important considerations include the degree of realized CEO pay versus targeted awards, the use and vesting of performance-based awards, historical shareholder support levels, and how the compensation committee calibrates metrics to operational levers under management control.
- 4
Approval of the Amended, Restated and Extended 2016 Equity Incentive Plan
ManagementBoard: FORApprove an amended, restated and extended 2016 Equity Incentive Plan that (i) establishes an initial new share reserve of 4,500,000 shares (plus certain forfeitures from the prior plan up to a cap), (ii) eliminates the Evergreen provision, (iii) clarifies clawback and dividend rules, (iv) terminates the Hearsay Plan if approved, and (v) renews the plan for a new 10‑year term.
More detail
This management proposal seeks shareholder approval to amend, restate and extend the Company’s 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Restated Plan”) so Yext can continue granting equity-based compensation after the Existing Plan’s scheduled expiration (Dec 19, 2026). Management argues approval is necessary to preserve the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate employees and to avoid increasing cash compensation in lieu of equity. The Restated Plan would provide a new initial share reserve of 4,500,000 shares plus forfeitures from the prior plan up to a capped amount, eliminate the automatic annual “evergreen” share increase, prohibit exchange programs and reduce certain dividend rights on unvested awards, and expressly subject awards to the Company’s clawback policy. The Board considered historical burn rates, recent large retention “Fiscal 27 Refresh” grants and forecasted grant practices (≈4.5M gross grants over two years, netting to ~0.5M after projected forfeitures) when setting the reserve; it also disclosed current overhang (≈20.4%) and the dilutive impact of the new reserve (~+4.5%). Governance-oriented changes (non-employee director limits, no tax gross-ups, clawback language) are emphasized to reduce perceived governance risk while enabling performance-based incentive design via PSUs and price-hurdle awards. For analysts, the primary trade-offs are (i) dilution and overhang versus the retention and performance-alignment benefits of the plan, (ii) the removal of the evergreen provision (which limits automatic future dilution), and (iii) the significant use of performance-based awards and price hurdles to align pay with shareholder return. The Board unanimously recommends the proposal because it believes failure to approve would impair recruiting and retention and harm long-term shareholder value, but investors should weigh the disclosed historical burn rate, recent large refresh grants, and the plan’s overhang when assessing dilution risk.
Nominees on the ballot2
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lynrock Lake LP | 18.1% | 18,188,607 | $70M |
| 2 | Lead Edge Capital Management, LLC | 7.8% | 7,843,296 | $30M |
| 3 | VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 6.1% | 6,109,388 | $23M |
| 4 | BlackRock, Inc. | 4.4% | 4,375,321 | $17M |
| 5 | BARCLAYS PLC | 4.0% | 4,003,599 | $15M |
| 6 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 3.5% | 3,534,874 | $14M |
| 7 | STATE STREET CORP | 2.9% | 2,871,878 | $11M |
| 8 | BlackRock, Inc. | 2.9% | 2,870,101 | $11M |
| 9 | GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC | 2.0% | 2,052,515 | $8M |
| 10 | DIMENSIONAL FUND ADVISORS LP | 2.0% | 2,003,268 | $8M |
Other Technology sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Yext Inc’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Yext Inc 2026 annual meeting?
- Yext Inc (YEXT) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Wednesday, June 10, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Yext Inc 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Yext Inc 2026 meeting is Monday, April 13, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Yext Inc's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 2 director nominees at the Yext Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Yext Inc 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 4 proposals at the Yext Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.