Waystar Holding Corp
4 nominees · 3 ballot items.
Elect four Class II directors; ratify KPMG LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for 2026; and hold a non-binding advisory vote on the frequency (one, two, or three years) of future advisory votes to approve Named Executive Officer compensation (Board recommends one year).
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Waystar Holding Corp’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot3
- 1
Election of four Class II directors
ManagementBoard: FORElect Robert A. DeMichiei, John Driscoll, Paul G. Moskowitz, and Lauren Young as Class II directors to hold office until the 2029 annual meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.
- 2
Ratification of independent registered public accounting firm
ManagementBoard: FORRatify the appointment of KPMG LLP as Waystar’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.
- 3
Advisory vote on frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes
ManagementBoard: FORNon-binding advisory vote asking stockholders to indicate whether future advisory votes to approve the compensation of Named Executive Officers should be held every one, two, or three years (Board recommends one year).
More detail
This proposal asks stockholders to indicate, on a non-binding advisory basis, the preferred frequency (one, two, or three years) for future advisory votes to approve the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers (Say-on-Pay). Management is seeking shareholder guidance because SEC rules require a frequency vote at least once every six years and because the Board values stockholder feedback on executive compensation governance. The Company, having completed its IPO in 2024 and held stockholder engagement on compensation matters, frames this vote as a governance cadence decision affecting how often shareholders will formally provide input on pay practices. The Board recommends an annual vote, arguing it provides routine, timely feedback, improves accountability of the Compensation Committee, and aligns with prevailing best practices. The outcome is non-binding, so while it signals stockholder preference, the Board retains discretion and will consider the result when setting future policy; the proxy statement also states that if no option receives a majority the Board will still consider the results. From an investor-relations perspective, an annual cadence can increase oversight and allow shareholders to respond more quickly to material changes in pay design or company performance; conversely, more frequent votes increase administrative burden and may amplify short-term reactions to performance swings. The Board’s recommendation is presented alongside the company’s context of strong 2025 performance, recent post-IPO compensation design changes (including RSUs and CEO PSUs), and ongoing engagement, which the Compensation Committee will weigh in interpreting the vote. For sophisticated analysts evaluating governance trade-offs, the key considerations are the advisory nature of the vote, potential signaling effects to the Compensation Committee, historical investor preferences (many investors favor annual Say-on-Pay), and how the chosen frequency would interact with the Company’s multi-year incentive structures (e.g., four-year PSUs). Overall, the proposal is governance-focused rather than operational, and while non-binding, it materially influences the cadence of shareholder oversight and the Compensation Committee’s engagement strategy.
Nominees on the ballot4
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EQT Fund Management S.a r.l. | 13.0% | 24,879,437 | $600M |
| 2 | CANADA PENSION PLAN INVESTMENT BOARD | 9.9% | 19,025,452 | $459M |
| 3 | BAIN CAPITAL INVESTORS LLC | 6.9% | 13,243,539 | $319M |
| 4 | FMR LLC | 6.4% | 12,202,679 | $294M |
| 5 | BlackRock, Inc. | 6.3% | 12,072,195 | $291M |
| 6 | ADVENT INTERNATIONAL, L.P. | 5.8% | 11,059,899 | $267M |
| 7 | VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 3.3% | 6,406,778 | $154M |
| 8 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 2.7% | 5,145,224 | $124M |
| 9 | Neuberger Berman Group LLC | 2.4% | 4,671,179 | $113M |
| 10 | GOLDENTREE ASSET MANAGEMENT LP | 2.3% | 4,443,671 | $107M |
Other Healthcare sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Waystar Holding Corp’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Waystar Holding Corp 2026 annual meeting?
- Waystar Holding Corp (WAY) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Monday, June 1, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Waystar Holding Corp 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Waystar Holding Corp 2026 meeting is Monday, April 6, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Waystar Holding Corp's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 4 director nominees at the Waystar Holding Corp 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Waystar Holding Corp 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Waystar Holding Corp 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.