Ul Solutions Inc
12 nominees · 3 ballot items.
Elect 12 directors to the Board; ratify PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2026; and approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement.
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Ul Solutions Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot3
- 1
Election of Directors
ManagementBoard: FORElect the 12 nominees named in the proxy statement to the Board of Directors to hold office until the 2027 Annual Meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.
- 2
Ratification of Retention of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
ManagementBoard: FORRatify the retention of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as UL Solutions' independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.
- 3
Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay
ManagementBoard: FORAn advisory (non-binding) proposal to approve the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement, including the CD&A, the Summary Compensation Table and other related disclosures.
More detail
This advisory "say-on-pay" proposal asks stockholders to approve, on a non-binding basis, the compensation paid to UL Solutions’ named executive officers as described in the proxy statement. Management and the HCC Committee are seeking shareholder endorsement to affirm that the Company’s pay programs — which for 2025 included a mix of base salary, a restructured annual incentive (AEIP) emphasizing adjusted EBITDA and revenue, and long-term incentives split between PSUs tied to three-year cumulative revenue and operating income and time-vested RSUs — align executive incentives with financial performance and long-term value creation. The proposal is advisory and not binding on the Board, but the Board and the HCC Committee state they will consider the outcome when setting future compensation. The filing emphasizes pay-for-performance features: a high proportion of variable, at-risk compensation, rigorous performance metrics, use of an independent compensation consultant, clawback provisions, stock ownership guidelines, and double-trigger change-in-control protections. The Company notes a recent history of strong stockholder support (approximately 99.9% in 2025), and management presents the proposal as validation of its compensation philosophy that links pay to adjusted EBITDA, revenue and multi-year operating outcomes. Given UL Solutions’ controlled-company structure (UL Standards & Engagement holds significant voting power), the advisory vote functions primarily as a feedback mechanism rather than a constraint; nonetheless, a negative vote would signal investor concern and the HCC Committee has signaled it would review and consider stockholder feedback. From a governance perspective, the proposal should be evaluated in light of the compensation plan mechanics (payout curves, weighting of PSU/RSU/AEIP), oversight by the HCC Committee, and the Company’s disclosure of risk-mitigation measures. Investors assessing the proposal should weigh the non-binding nature of the vote, the alignment of metrics with investor priorities (profitability and growth), the robust compensation governance features disclosed, and the broader context of the Company’s recent financial performance and controlled-shareholder arrangements.
Nominees on the ballot12
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc. | 3.6% | 7,285,895 | $624M |
| 2 | Capital International Investors | 3.0% | 6,074,266 | $521M |
| 3 | KAYNE ANDERSON RUDNICK INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC | 2.3% | 4,580,852 | $393M |
| 4 | Capital Research Global Investors | 1.8% | 3,653,938 | $313M |
| 5 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 1.7% | 3,456,747 | $296M |
| 6 | BlackRock, Inc. | 1.7% | 3,393,863 | $291M |
| 7 | Durable Capital Partners LP | 1.6% | 3,291,516 | $282M |
| 8 | VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 1.5% | 3,085,275 | $264M |
| 9 | JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC | 1.3% | 2,716,296 | $233M |
| 10 | BESSEMER GROUP INC | 0.9% | 1,775,110 | $152M |
Other Industrials sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Ul Solutions Inc’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Ul Solutions Inc 2026 annual meeting?
- Ul Solutions Inc (ULS) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Wednesday, May 20, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Ul Solutions Inc 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Ul Solutions Inc 2026 meeting is Wednesday, March 25, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Ul Solutions Inc's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 12 director nominees at the Ul Solutions Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Ul Solutions Inc 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Ul Solutions Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.