Textron Inc
11 nominees · 3 ballot items.
Elect eleven directors; ratify Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors for 2026; and approve, on an advisory basis, Textron’s executive compensation as disclosed in the proxy statement.
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Textron Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot3
- 1
Election of Directors
ManagementBoard: FORElection of eleven director nominees named in the proxy statement to hold office until the 2027 Annual Meeting or until their successors are elected and qualified.
- 2
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
ManagementBoard: FORRatify the Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Textron’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2026.
- 3
Advisory Vote to Approve Textron’s Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay
ManagementBoard: FORAdvisory (non-binding) vote to approve the compensation of Textron’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and compensation tables.
More detail
This non-binding proposal asks shareholders to approve Textron’s executive compensation as disclosed in the proxy, effectively endorsing the Board and Organization and Compensation Committee’s pay design and outcomes. Management seeks approval to confirm that its pay-for-performance program — which places a substantial portion of executives’ compensation at risk via PSUs (50% of LTI), RSUs and stock options, and ties annual incentive payouts to enterprise net operating profit, manufacturing cash flow and a qualitative ESG component — is supported by shareholders. For 2025, annual incentive payouts totaled 128.6% of target and the 2023–2025 PSU cycle paid at 93.3% of target, demonstrating the program’s link to measured performance; the Compensation Committee retained independent adviser Pearl Meyer and used a talent peer group for benchmarking. Governance features intended to protect shareholder interests include clawback policies, no single-trigger change-in-control vesting, double-trigger protections for equity awards in a change-in-control, anti-hedging and pledging prohibitions, and robust share ownership requirements. The Board also discloses recent refinements to the program, such as adding an AI adoption component (5% weight) to the 2026 annual incentive in place of the prior ESG quantitative element, and emphasizes ongoing shareholder outreach and responsiveness to vote outcomes. Management argues that the program’s emphasis on long-term performance alignment, rigorous goal-setting tied to the Annual Operating Plan, and oversight by an independent committee justify a FOR recommendation. Potential investor concerns include the use of qualitative discretion (e.g., ESG scoring and qualitative AI assessments), the non-binding nature of the vote, and the magnitude of realized CEO pay driven by equity value changes; the Board states it will consider shareholder feedback and prior vote results in future decisions. In evaluating the merits, analysts should weigh the clear performance linkages and governance safeguards against areas where subjectivity or discretion could introduce variability in pay outcomes and monitor any material changes in plan metrics or outcomes over time.
Nominees on the ballot11
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 6.5% | 11,335,247 | $993M |
| 2 | STATE STREET CORP | 5.6% | 9,744,298 | $853M |
| 3 | BlackRock, Inc. | 4.3% | 7,556,018 | $662M |
| 4 | VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 4.3% | 7,484,955 | $655M |
| 5 | FMR LLC | 3.5% | 6,115,281 | $535M |
| 6 | AQR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 3.2% | 5,533,992 | $479M |
| 7 | T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc. | 3.0% | 5,180,208 | $454M |
| 8 | GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC | 2.5% | 4,403,672 | $396M |
| 9 | Boston Partners | 2.4% | 4,219,562 | $369M |
| 10 | Invesco Ltd. | 2.4% | 4,110,682 | $360M |
Other Industrials sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Textron Inc’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Textron Inc 2026 annual meeting?
- Textron Inc (TXT) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Wednesday, April 29, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Textron Inc 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Textron Inc 2026 meeting is Monday, March 2, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Textron Inc's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 11 director nominees at the Textron Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Textron Inc 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Textron Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.