Servicetitan Inc
3 nominees · 3 ballot items.
Elect three Class II directors (Michael Brown, Byron Deeter, Vahe Kuzoyan); ratify PwC as independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year ending January 31, 2027; and approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the frequency (1, 2, or 3 years, or abstain) of future Say-on-Pay votes, with the board recommending a 1‑year frequency.
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Servicetitan Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot3
- 1
Election of Directors
ManagementBoard: FORElect three Class II directors — Michael Brown, Byron Deeter, and Vahe Kuzoyan — to serve until the 2029 annual meeting and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.
- 2
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
ManagementBoard: FORRatify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2027.
- 3
Advisory (Non-Binding) Vote on the Frequency of Future Stockholder Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay
ManagementBoard: FORAn advisory (non-binding) vote for stockholders to indicate whether future advisory votes on the compensation of named executive officers should occur every 1, 2, or 3 years (or abstain); the board recommends voting for a frequency of '1 YEAR'.
More detail
This management proposal requests an advisory, non-binding instruction from stockholders on how often the Company should hold Say-on-Pay votes (options: 1, 2, or 3 years, or abstain). Under Dodd‑Frank and SEC rules, this frequency vote is advisory only; it does not directly change executive compensation but signals shareholder preferences to the board and compensation committee. Management and the board support an annual vote, arguing that a yearly Say‑on‑Pay provides more timely and direct feedback on pay practices relative to the Company’s annual disclosures, and fosters an ongoing dialogue with investors about compensation and governance matters. The board’s recommendation reflects a governance judgment balancing responsiveness to investors with administrative considerations; the proxy statement explains that the board weighed the benefits and consequences of each alternative before endorsing a 1‑year frequency. Because the outcome is advisory, the board will still retain discretion but commits to consider the vote’s outcome when setting future frequency. From an investor perspective, annual votes offer more frequent accountability and quicker feedback loops but may impose more frequent engagement and administrative burden compared with multi‑year approaches; multi‑year options can reduce administrative costs and provide longer horizons for evaluating compensation outcomes. The proxy also notes the procedural fallback that if no option secures a majority the plurality (the option receiving the highest votes) will be deemed preferred, and that broker non‑votes do not affect the outcome. For analysts evaluating governance, this proposal is a standard post‑Dodd‑Frank governance item where the key considerations are board responsiveness, investor engagement history, and whether past Say‑on‑Pay outcomes or pay controversies suggest more frequent shareholder input is warranted. Institutional investors often favor annual votes for engagement reasons; thus management’s recommendation aligns the board with a commonly held investor preference and signals willingness to engage regularly on compensation practices. Overall, while non‑binding, the vote functions as an important governance metric that can influence future compensation committee behavior and investor relations strategy.
Nominees on the ballot3
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ICONIQ Capital, LLC | 8.9% | 8,514,137 | $540M |
| 2 | Deer Management Co. LLC | 5.3% | 5,068,064 | $322M |
| 3 | KAYNE ANDERSON RUDNICK INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC | 4.3% | 4,107,177 | $261M |
| 4 | Battery Management Corp. | 3.5% | 3,299,941 | $209M |
| 5 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 2.8% | 2,679,416 | $170M |
| 6 | VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 2.3% | 2,201,266 | $140M |
| 7 | FMR LLC | 2.3% | 2,184,035 | $139M |
| 8 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC | 2.1% | 2,046,619 | $130M |
| 9 | GENERATION INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLP | 1.8% | 1,751,224 | $111M |
| 10 | Index Venture Growth Associates IV Ltd | 1.8% | 1,711,862 | $109M |
Other Technology sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Servicetitan Inc’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Servicetitan Inc 2026 annual meeting?
- Servicetitan Inc (TTAN) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Wednesday, June 17, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Servicetitan Inc 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Servicetitan Inc 2026 meeting is Wednesday, April 22, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Servicetitan Inc's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 3 director nominees at the Servicetitan Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Servicetitan Inc 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Servicetitan Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.