Targa Resources Corp
4 nominees · 3 ballot items.
Elect four Class I directors (Paul W. Chung, Charles R. Crisp, Laura C. Fulton, R. Keith Teague); ratify PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for 2026; and approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers for fiscal 2025.
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Targa Resources Corp’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot3
- 1
Election of Class I Directors
ManagementBoard: FORElect four Class I directors — Paul W. Chung, Charles R. Crisp, Laura C. Fulton and R. Keith Teague — each to serve until the 2029 annual meeting of stockholders.
- 2
Ratification of Selection of Independent Auditors
ManagementBoard: FORRatify the Audit Committee’s selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for 2026.
- 3
Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay
ManagementBoard: FORNon-binding, advisory approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, as disclosed in the proxy statement.
More detail
This advisory (non-binding) proposal asks stockholders to approve the Company’s named executive officer compensation as disclosed in the proxy materials for fiscal 2025. Management is seeking shareholder approval to confirm that its compensation philosophy — which emphasizes performance-based pay, a mix of short-term cash incentives and long-term equity incentives (50% PSUs and 50% RSUs), and specific metrics tied to adjusted EBITDA, adjusted CFFO per share, 3‑year ROIC, operational execution, sustainability and safety — is supported by investors. The Compensation Committee uses an independent consultant (Meridian) and applies both quantitative and qualitative assessments to annual bonus funding, with capped payout mechanics and a total plan cap; long-term PSUs are tied to relative TSR versus the Alerian US Midstream Index (target at the 55th percentile, maximum 250%). The board highlights several governance and risk-mitigation features — clawback policy, stock ownership guidelines, no single-trigger CIC vesting or excise tax gross-ups, annual compensation risk assessment — intended to align management incentives and limit excessive risk-taking. The proxy notes strong historical shareholder support for say-on-pay (94% in 2025) and describes robust shareholder outreach, frequent engagement and the Board’s commitment to consider vote outcomes when setting future compensation. Notwithstanding these features, the proposal occurs in the context of materially high realized and potential pay levels (notably substantial equity grants and a CEO pay ratio of ~145:1), which can attract investor scrutiny; the non-binding nature means that, even if not passed overwhelmingly, the Board will evaluate investor feedback rather than be compelled to change specific elements. Overall, the Board recommends FOR the proposal on the basis that the program is designed to attract and retain executives, tie pay to multi-year performance and align executives’ interests with long-term shareholder value, while retaining discretion to refine plan design in response to shareholder feedback.
Nominees on the ballot4
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 6.5% | 13,950,353 | $3.5B |
| 2 | WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT GROUP LLP | 6.4% | 13,679,529 | $3.4B |
| 3 | STATE STREET CORP | 6.3% | 13,599,281 | $3.4B |
| 4 | VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 5.5% | 11,851,389 | $3.0B |
| 5 | BlackRock, Inc. | 4.2% | 8,967,488 | $2.2B |
| 6 | HARRIS ASSOCIATES L P | 4.0% | 8,487,303 | $2.1B |
| 7 | GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC | 2.5% | 5,339,536 | $1.3B |
| 8 | BlackRock, Inc. | 2.2% | 4,690,086 | $1.2B |
| 9 | TORTOISE CAPITAL ADVISORS, L.L.C. | 1.7% | 3,546,761 | $889M |
| 10 | Blackstone Inc. | 1.6% | 3,342,348 | $838M |
Other Energy sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Targa Resources Corp’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Targa Resources Corp 2026 annual meeting?
- Targa Resources Corp (TRGP) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Thursday, May 21, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Targa Resources Corp 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Targa Resources Corp 2026 meeting is Tuesday, March 24, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Targa Resources Corp's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 4 director nominees at the Targa Resources Corp 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Targa Resources Corp 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Targa Resources Corp 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.