Service Corp International
10 nominees · 7 ballot items.
Election of 10 Directors; Ratification of PwC as independent auditors; Advisory 'Say-on-Pay' vote on Named Executive Officer compensation; Amendments to Articles/Bylaws to reduce minimum directors, permit Board to increase directors and fill new vacancies, and limit officer liability; Approval of the 2026 Equity Incentive Plan.
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Service Corp International’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot7
- 1
Election of Directors
ManagementBoard: FORElection of ten director nominees to the Board for one-year terms.
- 2
Ratify the Selection of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
ManagementBoard: FORRatification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026.
- 3
Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation (“Say-on-Pay”
ManagementBoard: FORNon-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of the company’s Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the proxy statement.
More detail
The advisory 'say-on-pay' proposal asks shareholders to endorse the compensation programs for the Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the CD&A and tables. Management seeks affirmation to validate its compensation philosophy linking pay to performance and to obtain shareholder feedback; while non-binding, a strong 'for' vote signals shareholder support and informs the Compensation Committee's future decisions. The company highlights that a high percentage of CEO and NEO compensation is performance-based and that pay structures align with corporate metrics (normalized EPS, free cash flow per share, comparable preneed production, customer satisfaction modifier, and long-term TSR with ROE modifier). The Compensation Committee points to historical shareholder support (e.g., ~88% in 2025) and ongoing shareholder engagement. Key contextual considerations include the firm's demonstrated TSR outperformance, updates to clawback and change-in-control provisions, and the use of a broad peer comparator group for benchmarking; criticisms common to 'say-on-pay' votes—such as concerns over quantum, use of discretion, change-in-control severance, or perquisites—are noted implicitly but the company's disclosures stress alignment and governance safeguards. The board recommends a 'FOR' vote to reaffirm support for the NEO compensation program and to allow the Compensation Committee to continue its design.
- 4
Proposal to Amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws to Reduce the Minimum Required Number of Directors
ManagementBoard: FORAmend Articles/Bylaws to change minimum number of directors from nine to three, providing Board flexibility.
More detail
This management proposal seeks shareholder approval to amend the Articles and Bylaws to reduce the Board's minimum size from nine to three directors and to remove outdated transitional language. Management frames the change as a flexibility measure to manage vacancies and retirements without immediate replacement, aligning corporate governance documents with modern practices and allowing the Board to function efficiently. The amendment keeps the maximum board size at fifteen and requires a majority shareholder vote to take effect. The change is not unusual for Delaware/Texas corporations seeking governance agility, but reducing minimum board size to three is at the extreme low end of public company practice and could, in the absence of strong safeguards, raise concerns about entrenchment, shareholder access to board representation, and potential diminution of independent oversight if the board were temporarily shrunk. However, SCI retains a large current board (10 directors) and a history of high independence (9 of 10 independent), which management cites to alleviate concerns. The board's recommendation to approve the amendment is justified primarily on operational flexibility; skeptics would weigh that benefit against governance risk and monitor whether additional governance safeguards (e.g., proxy access, committee independence) remain robust.
- 5
Proposal to Amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws to Permit the Board to Increase the Number of Directors and Fill Newly Created Vacancies
ManagementBoard: FORAmend Articles/Bylaws to allow the Board to increase Board size and fill newly created vacancies without shareholder meeting, aligning with TBOC.
More detail
This management proposal would amend governing documents to allow the Board to increase its size and fill newly created vacancies without waiting for a shareholder meeting, harmonizing corporate documents with the Texas Business Organizations Code. Management argues this change enables timely appointments to address strategic needs and succession planning without incurring the costs and delays of a special shareholder meeting. The amendment reduces procedural friction, but investors often evaluate such changes for potential entrenchment risk and concentration of appointment power; the board's existing practice of majority independent committees and proxy access mitigates some concerns. The proposal is routine in many jurisdictions, and the board recommends a 'FOR' vote for operational flexibility and alignment with statutory norms.
- 6
Proposal to Amend the Company's Articles of Incorporation to Limit the Liability of Officers as Permitted by Law
ManagementBoard: FORAmend Articles to add officer exculpation to the same extent as directors, to the fullest extent permitted by Texas law.
More detail
Management seeks to add language to the Articles of Incorporation to limit officer liability to the maximum extent allowed by recent amendments to the Texas Business Organizations Code, mirroring existing director protections. Management argues this aligns incentives, reduces litigation risk and costs, and aids recruitment/retention of senior executives. The proposed limitation excludes acts involving disloyalty, bad faith, intentional misconduct, improper personal benefit, and liabilities required by statute, which aligns with typical legal carve-outs. Investors may view exculpation as reasonable where coupled with strong governance, but some may be wary that exculpation could reduce recourse for shareholder harms; the board argues statutory safeguards and existing fiduciary duties mitigate that concern. The board recommends a 'FOR' vote to implement parity between directors and officers regarding exculpation under Texas law.
- 7
Proposal Regarding the 2026 Equity Incentive Plan
ManagementBoard: FORApprove the 2026 Equity Incentive Plan to authorize issuance of 8,200,000 shares for equity awards to attract/retain employees and directors.
More detail
This management proposal requests shareholder approval of the 2026 Equity Incentive Plan, which replaces the 2016 plan and requests a refreshed share reserve of 8.2 million shares to support equity-based awards for employees and directors. Management frames the plan as necessary to recruit, retain and incentivize talent and to align pay with performance. The plan includes governance protections: a one-year minimum vesting (with limited exceptions for up to 5% of the reserve), prohibition on repricing without shareholder approval, no evergreen provision, limits on director awards ($900k/year), clawback provisions, and double-trigger change-in-control vesting. Approval would increase potential dilution from ~3.9% to ~8.6% overhang; management estimates the reserve will last approximately ten years based on historical grant levels. For sophisticated analysis, key considerations include the plan's dilution impact, burn rate (~0.35% three-year average), alignment of award types to long-term incentives (mix of options, restricted stock, performance units), governance features that mitigate potential abuse, and lack of evergreen provision. The Board recommends a 'FOR' vote.
Nominees on the ballot10
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BlackRock, Inc. | 5.4% | 7,507,752 | $619M |
| 2 | VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 5.1% | 6,997,939 | $577M |
| 3 | T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc. | 4.8% | 6,634,818 | $547M |
| 4 | Select Equity Group, L.P. | 4.4% | 6,113,751 | $504M |
| 5 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 4.3% | 5,999,374 | $495M |
| 6 | FMR LLC | 3.6% | 4,987,911 | $412M |
| 7 | BAILLIE GIFFORD CO | 3.3% | 4,546,684 | $375M |
| 8 | STATE STREET CORP | 3.2% | 4,401,510 | $363M |
| 9 | Swedbank AB | 3.0% | 4,168,076 | $344M |
| 10 | BlackRock, Inc. | 2.9% | 4,002,751 | $330M |
Other Consumer Cyclical sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Service Corp International’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Service Corp International 2026 annual meeting?
- Service Corp International (SCI) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Wednesday, May 6, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Service Corp International 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Service Corp International 2026 meeting is Monday, March 9, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Service Corp International's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 10 director nominees at the Service Corp International 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Service Corp International 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 7 proposals at the Service Corp International 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.