Southern Copper Corp
8 nominees · 3 ballot items.
Elect eight directors; ratify the selection of Galaz, Yamazaki, Ruiz Urquiza S.C. (a Deloitte member firm) as independent accountants for 2026; and a non-binding advisory (say-on-pay) vote to approve executive compensation as disclosed in the proxy statement.
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Southern Copper Corp’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot3
- 1
Election of Eight Directors
ManagementBoard: FORVote to elect eight director nominees (Vicente Ariztegui Andreve; Javier Arrigunaga Gomez del Campo; Enrique Castillo Sánchez Mejorada; Leonardo Contreras Lerdo de Tejada; Germán Larrea Mota-Velasco; Luis Miguel Palomino Bonilla; Carlos Ruiz Sacristán; Jose Pedro Valenzuela Rionda) to serve until the 2027 annual meeting.
- 2
Ratify Selection of Independent Accountants
ManagementBoard: FORRatification of the Audit Committee’s selection of Galaz, Yamazaki, Ruiz Urquiza S.C. (a member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited) as the Company's independent accountants for calendar year 2026.
- 3
Non-Binding Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay
ManagementBoard: FORA non-binding, advisory proposal asking stockholders to approve the compensation of the Company's named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement (Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative).
More detail
This non-binding advisory proposal asks shareholders to approve the Company’s disclosed executive compensation described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and related tables and narrative. Management is seeking shareholder endorsement to affirm its compensation philosophy — which emphasizes compliance with Peruvian and Mexican legal requirements, discretionary cash compensation (including base salaries, discretionary bonuses, and mandated profit-sharing), and retention of key executives — despite the absence of modern equity-based long-term incentive awards (the Stock Incentive Plan expired in 2006 and no options have been granted since 2000). The Board and Compensation Committee present the proposal as a signal of alignment with stockholder interests and intend to consider the advisory vote’s outcome when setting future pay, although the vote is non-binding. The Company notes prior strong shareholder support (99.41% in favor in 2025), which management interprets as validation of its approach; it also emphasizes that brokers are prohibited from voting uninstructed shares on executive compensation matters, meaning retail and institutional beneficial owners must provide voting instructions for their holdings to be counted. The Board’s recommendation to vote FOR is grounded in the view that compensation is calibrated to promote operational goals (production, cost control, safety) and to comply with local labor regimes that shape pay design, while discretionary bonuses allow flexibility tied to company performance and retention. The Compensation Committee, which is not wholly independent due to the company’s controlled-company status, will nevertheless consider the advisory result in future compensation decisions and disclosures. Given the Company’s controlled ownership structure and the legal/market constraints on pay design in its primary jurisdictions, the advisory vote functions as a governance check and a means for shareholders to express approval or concern; management frames a FOR vote as supportive of continuity and the current executive compensation framework. Potential investors evaluating the proposal should weigh the high historical shareholder approval, the controlled-company governance context, the reliance on discretionary cash incentives rather than equity, and regulatory/broker voting mechanics that affect vote outcomes.
Nominees on the ballot8
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Capital World Investors | 1.0% | 8,611,291 | $1.5B |
| 2 | BlackRock, Inc. | 0.4% | 3,577,309 | $616M |
| 3 | STATE STREET CORP | 0.4% | 2,913,623 | $501M |
| 4 | Neuberger Berman Group LLC | 0.3% | 2,608,992 | $449M |
| 5 | PRICE T ROWE ASSOCIATES INC /MD/ | 0.3% | 2,460,278 | $423M |
| 6 | MIRAE ASSET GLOBAL ETFS HOLDINGS Ltd. | 0.3% | 2,321,371 | $399M |
| 7 | Fisher Asset Management, LLC | 0.3% | 2,308,526 | $397M |
| 8 | ACADIAN ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | 0.2% | 1,851,985 | $319M |
| 9 | BlackRock, Inc. | 0.2% | 1,843,082 | $317M |
| 10 | BlackRock, Inc. | 0.2% | 1,285,187 | $221M |
Other Basic Materials sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Southern Copper Corp’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Southern Copper Corp 2026 annual meeting?
- Southern Copper Corp (SCCO) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Friday, May 29, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Southern Copper Corp 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Southern Copper Corp 2026 meeting is Thursday, April 2, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Southern Copper Corp's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 8 director nominees at the Southern Copper Corp 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Southern Copper Corp 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Southern Copper Corp 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.