Royal Gold Inc
2 nominees · 3 ballot items.
Three proposals: (1) Election of two Class III director nominees (Fabiana Chubbs and Sybil Veenman); (2) Advisory (non-binding) vote to approve named executive officer compensation (“say-on-pay”); and (3) Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditor for 2026.
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Royal Gold Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot3
- 1
Election of the two Class III director nominees
ManagementBoard: FORElection of Fabiana Chubbs and Sybil Veenman as Class III directors to serve three-year terms expiring in 2029.
- 2
Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers
ManagementBoard: FORNon-binding, advisory “say-on-pay” vote to approve executive compensation as disclosed in the proxy (Compensation Discussion & Analysis, tables, and narrative).
More detail
This management proposal requests an advisory (non-binding) approval of the Company’s executive compensation program as disclosed in the proxy statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and related tables. Management and the CNG Committee are seeking endorsement of their 2025 pay decisions after a year of exceptional operational performance and a transformative acquisition strategy (including the Sandstorm Gold and Horizon Copper transactions), which materially increased scale, net GEOs, and shareholder returns. The Board frames the program as market‑aligned and primarily at‑risk, with pay elements including base salary, a formulaic short‑term incentive scorecard (weighted to production, reserves growth, expense control, stewardship and individual goals), and long‑term equity split between time‑based restricted shares and TSR‑based performance shares tied to a peer group. The CNG Committee exercised discretion in 2025 to award special retention/transaction-related bonuses (cash and restricted shares) to recognize extraordinary efforts around the acquisitions, while maintaining two‑thirds of the special bonus in restricted shares to promote retention. The Board emphasizes pay‑for‑performance features—peer‑relative TSR for performance shares and objective operational metrics for annual bonuses—and also highlights governance safeguards including benchmarking, clawback policy, stock ownership guidelines, and committee oversight. Management notes the advisory vote is non‑binding but will be considered in future compensation decisions; historically the Company has received strong support on say‑on‑pay. Investors should weigh the alignment of incentives with long‑term value creation against potential concerns about rewarding outcomes influenced by metal price cycles; the Company argues it mitigates this risk through metric selection and relative performance measures. Overall, the Board recommends FOR the proposal on the basis that the program supports retention, aligns executives with stockholders, and appropriately rewards execution and strategic value creation.
- 3
Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditor
ManagementBoard: FORRatification of the Audit Committee’s selection of Ernst & Young LLP as Royal Gold’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026.
Nominees on the ballot2
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Capital World Investors | 12.4% | 10,516,187 | $2.7B |
| 2 | BlackRock, Inc. | 5.4% | 4,570,992 | $1.2B |
| 3 | VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 4.8% | 4,110,289 | $1.0B |
| 4 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 4.4% | 3,763,318 | $958M |
| 5 | STATE STREET CORP | 4.2% | 3,600,198 | $916M |
| 6 | VAN ECK ASSOCIATES CORP | 3.8% | 3,203,866 | $815M |
| 7 | BlackRock, Inc. | 2.8% | 2,408,921 | $613M |
| 8 | GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC | 1.7% | 1,416,344 | $361M |
| 9 | Invesco Ltd. | 1.6% | 1,326,281 | $338M |
| 10 | BlackRock, Inc. | 1.3% | 1,125,000 | $286M |
Other Basic Materials sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Royal Gold Inc’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Royal Gold Inc 2026 annual meeting?
- Royal Gold Inc (RGLD) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Thursday, May 21, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Royal Gold Inc 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Royal Gold Inc 2026 meeting is Thursday, March 26, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Royal Gold Inc's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 2 director nominees at the Royal Gold Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Royal Gold Inc 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Royal Gold Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.