Arcus Biosciences Inc
4 nominees · 3 ballot items.
1) Elect four Class II directors (Dietmar Berger, David Lacey, Nicole Lambert, Johanna Mercier) to serve until 2029; 2) Ratify Ernst & Young LLP as Arcus’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2026; 3) Advisory (non-binding) approval of the compensation of Arcus’s named executive officers (say-on-pay).
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Arcus Biosciences Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot3
- 1
Election of Directors (four Class II nominees
ManagementBoard: FORElect four Class II director nominees—Dietmar Berger, M.D., Ph.D.; David Lacey, M.D.; Nicole Lambert; and Johanna Mercier—to hold office until the 2029 annual meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.
- 2
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
ManagementBoard: FORRatify the Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Arcus’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.
- 3
Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay
ManagementBoard: FORA non‑binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation paid to Arcus’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S‑K (the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative).
More detail
This non‑binding proposal asks shareholders to approve the overall compensation program for Arcus’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, tables, and narrative. Management frames its program around a pay‑for‑performance philosophy that combines base salary, annual cash bonuses tied to corporate and individual goals, and long‑term equity awards (weighted toward options) to align executives’ incentives with stockholder value and retention. The Compensation Committee notes specific 2025 business achievements—advancement of multiple Phase 3 programs, enrollment milestones, strategic collaborations and successful fundraising—that it says justify full payment of target bonuses and the equity grants made during the year. The Board also emphasizes that approximately 94% of votes supported the company’s say‑on‑pay at the 2025 meeting, which management interprets as stockholder endorsement of its compensation approach. Supporters would argue the mix of long‑term incentives and the use of options support alignment with stock price performance and long‑term value creation. Critics could point to the size and structure of equity grants, potential pay levels relative to peers, and the advisory nature of the vote (i.e., it does not bind the Board), and may question whether compensation outcomes sufficiently reflect longer‑term clinical and commercial results. The Board’s recommendation to vote FOR references the Compensation Committee’s review processes, use of a peer reference group and retention/alignment objectives, and notes that the outcome will inform future compensation decisions. Given the company’s clinical‑stage profile and significant equity components, a sophisticated assessment would weigh the appropriateness of metrics used for bonus determination, the balance between retention and performance incentives, previous shareholder feedback, and the company’s near‑term clinical milestones and cash runway when evaluating this proposal.
Nominees on the ballot4
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. | 25.0% | 31,424,760 | $679M |
| 2 | BlackRock, Inc. | 7.7% | 9,662,107 | $209M |
| 3 | STATE STREET CORP | 4.3% | 5,412,901 | $117M |
| 4 | WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT GROUP LLP | 4.3% | 5,411,591 | $117M |
| 5 | SUVRETTA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC | 4.0% | 5,030,993 | $109M |
| 6 | VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 3.4% | 4,272,056 | $92M |
| 7 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 3.1% | 3,856,725 | $83M |
| 8 | Woodline Partners LP | 3.0% | 3,777,798 | $82M |
| 9 | MARSHALL WACE, LLP | 3.0% | 3,761,437 | $81M |
| 10 | BlackRock, Inc. | 2.1% | 2,688,451 | $58M |
Other Healthcare sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Arcus Biosciences Inc’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Arcus Biosciences Inc 2026 annual meeting?
- Arcus Biosciences Inc (RCUS) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Thursday, June 11, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Arcus Biosciences Inc 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Arcus Biosciences Inc 2026 meeting is Thursday, April 16, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Arcus Biosciences Inc's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 4 director nominees at the Arcus Biosciences Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Arcus Biosciences Inc 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Arcus Biosciences Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.