Boardroom Alpha
Meeting calendar
PRTH · Annual meeting · Thursday, June 11, 2026

Priority Technology Holdings Inc

6 nominees · 4 ballot items.

Elect six directors; approve Amendment No. 2 to the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan to add 8,000,000 shares; approve, on a non-binding basis, named executive officer compensation (say-on-pay); and ratify KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2026.

Market cap
$588M
1Y TSR
-7.8%
Board grade
B-
Record date
Apr 14, 2026
Filing
DEF 14A
Meeting concluded · Jun 11, 2026

Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Priority Technology Holdings Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.

Proposals

On the ballot4

  1. 1

    Election of Directors

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Elect six director nominees (Thomas Priore, Marc Crisafulli, Marietta Davis, Christina Favilla, Clayton Main, and Michael Passilla) to serve until the 2027 annual meeting or until their earlier resignation, death or removal.

  2. 2

    Approval of Amendment 2 to the Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive Plan

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Company's 2018 Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the plan by 8,000,000 shares (from 9,185,696 to 17,185,696) to support future equity and incentive awards.

    More detail

    This management proposal requests shareholder approval to amend the Company’s 2018 Equity Incentive Plan to add 8,000,000 shares, increasing the plan pool from 9,185,696 to 17,185,696 shares. Management frames the amendment as a necessary tool to attract, retain, and motivate directors, consultants, officers, and other employees through equity and incentive awards that align recipients’ interests with those of stockholders and promote long-term value creation. The Compensation Committee and Board unanimously approved the amendment subject to shareholder approval and emphasize that they carefully manage share usage under existing plans to limit dilution. The proposal is presented against the backdrop of a disclosed preliminary, non-binding take-private proposal led by the company’s CEO, and the filing explicitly cautions that any awards granted after approval could be affected by the terms of a future transaction; the Special Committee (independent directors) is evaluating that proposal. The amendment’s potential governance implications include incremental dilution of outstanding common stock and the prospect that newly granted awards could be accelerated, cashed out, or treated differently in the event of a change-of-control or take-private transaction. From a stewardship perspective, shareholders should weigh management’s recruiting and retention arguments and the operational need for equity incentives against dilution and potential timing concerns given the pending strategic proposal. The Board recommends FOR the amendment, arguing it is in the company’s and shareholders’ best interests regardless of the Special Committee’s review, but the filing instructs shareholders to consider the pendency of the take-private proposal when evaluating the request. If approved, the increase would provide the company with additional flexibility to grant long-term awards, but it could also expand the pool available for insiders and executives, making continued disclosure and judicious grant practices important. Overall, the proposal is typical of growth-stage companies seeking capacity for equity-based compensation but must be assessed in context of ownership concentration and the disclosed potential transaction.

  3. 3

    Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officer Compensation (Say-on-Pay

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Non-binding, advisory approval of the compensation of the Company's Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the proxy statement, including the compensation philosophy, policies, practices, and Summary Compensation Table.

    More detail

    This management-sponsored, non-binding advisory proposal asks shareholders to approve the compensation of the company's Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the proxy, encompassing the compensation philosophy, Summary Compensation Table, and narrative discussion. Management argues that its programs are performance-based, incorporate annual and long-term incentives, and include governance safeguards such as clawback, anti-hedging, anti-pledging, stock ownership requirements, and net share retention—designed to align executive incentives with shareholder value over multiple time horizons. The Company highlights that compensation is intended to attract, retain, and motivate executives and that pay is tied to specific financial, strategic, and qualitative goals; the Compensation Committee oversees these arrangements. Because the vote is advisory, it will not bind the Board but the Compensation Committee states it will consider the result when making future decisions, and the next say-on-pay vote is expected in 2027. Contextually, the Company operates as a Nasdaq-listed fintech with concentrated insider ownership (the CEO beneficially owns a majority stake) and a pending preliminary take-private proposal led by the CEO; these factors could complicate shareholder assessments of executive pay, particularly as certain equity awards and retention incentives may interact with any potential transaction. The optics of approving potentially large equity awards should be judged against recent executive pay disclosed (including substantial stock awards to the CEO and other NEOs) and the Company's performance metrics and governance safeguards. Investors should weigh whether disclosed incentives strongly tie to long-term performance and whether the Compensation Committee's independence and responsiveness to shareholder feedback are sufficient. Although the Board recommends a FOR vote, sophisticated investors may seek additional clarity on performance metrics, vesting schedules, dilution impact of equity grants, and how the company would treat equity awards in the event of a transaction. Overall, the proposal is a routine say-on-pay request but is materially contextualized by ownership concentration, recent significant equity awards, and an active strategic review, which could influence shareholder judgment.

  4. 4

    Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2026.

Director elections

Nominees on the ballot6

Independent
Tenure on this board
6.7 yrs
Also a director at
Oppfi Inc (OPFI)
Ownership

Top institutional holders10

Latest 13F quarter
1Buckley Capital Advisors, LLC2.6%2,136,213$10M
2FourWorld Capital Management LLC1.9%1,583,904$7M
3Steamboat Capital Partners, LLC1.6%1,277,396$6M
4VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC1.5%1,210,745$6M
5BlackRock, Inc.1.2%1,024,133$5M
6PRELUDE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC1.0%798,328$4M
7WELLS FARGO COMPANY/MN0.8%679,500$3M
8Divisadero Street Capital Management, LP0.8%653,019$3M
9GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC0.7%578,676$3M
10Norwood Investment Partners, LP0.7%556,016$3M
Filings

Recent key filings

Periodic reports
Definitive proxies
Reference

Frequently asked questions

When is the Priority Technology Holdings Inc 2026 annual meeting?
Priority Technology Holdings Inc (PRTH) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Thursday, June 11, 2026.
What is the record date for the Priority Technology Holdings Inc 2026 meeting?
The record date for the Priority Technology Holdings Inc 2026 meeting is Tuesday, April 14, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
Who are the director nominees for Priority Technology Holdings Inc's 2026 meeting?
The board is presenting 6 director nominees at the Priority Technology Holdings Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Priority Technology Holdings Inc 2026 meeting?
Shareholders will vote on 4 proposals at the Priority Technology Holdings Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
Disclaimer

The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.

This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.

None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.

No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.

Full disclaimer