Packaging Corp Of America
9 nominees · 3 ballot items.
Elect nine director nominees for one-year terms; ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2026; and approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of the company’s named executive officers (say-on-pay).
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Packaging Corp Of America’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot3
- 1
Election of Directors
ManagementBoard: FORElect nine nominees named in the proxy statement to serve for one-year terms expiring at the 2027 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
- 2
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
ManagementBoard: FORRatify the appointment of KPMG LLP as Packaging Corporation of America’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2026.
- 3
Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay
ManagementBoard: FORNon-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of the company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and related tables.
More detail
This management-sponsored, non-binding "say-on-pay" proposal asks shareholders to approve the company’s disclosed executive compensation for the named executive officers. Management is seeking shareholder approval to affirm its compensation practices, which emphasize long-term performance via a mix of time-vesting restricted stock and performance-based equity (ROIC and TSR units) and an annual cash incentive tied to EPS excluding special items. The compensation committee relies on independent consultants and peer-group benchmarking and has structured awards with rigorous performance hurdles (e.g., ROIC rewards require above-median performance and TSR units pay out only for top-quartile performance ranges) and caps that limit outsized payouts. The board recommends a FOR vote, citing that the mix of incentive mechanisms aligns management incentives with shareholder value creation, has driven strong capital allocation and operational performance, and that the program lacks certain problematic features (no employment agreements, no single-trigger change-of-control vesting, and stock ownership/anti-hedging policies). The proposal is advisory and non-binding, but the company commits to carefully review shareholder feedback and consider results when making future compensation decisions; historically, PCA’s say-on-pay has received very strong support (over 93% in recent years). From a governance perspective, the proposal’s context includes robust performance metrics, independent committee oversight, and use of peer-based relative metrics that tie pay to competitive outcomes. Risk considerations include that advisory approval does not alter contractual rights and that the company reserves discretion in compensation design; however, the current structure favors long-term alignment and retention through multi-year performance periods and substantial equity orientation. Overall, an analyst assessing the proposal should weigh the strong historical shareholder support, the explicit performance-based design (ROIC and TSR), the board’s independent oversight and consultant use, and the non-binding nature of the vote when evaluating whether the compensation program is consistent with shareholder interests.
Nominees on the ballot9
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PRICE T ROWE ASSOCIATES INC /MD/ | 7.2% | 6,389,548 | $1.4B |
| 2 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 6.5% | 5,802,254 | $1.2B |
| 3 | VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 4.9% | 4,380,570 | $930M |
| 4 | STATE STREET CORP | 4.8% | 4,244,444 | $906M |
| 5 | BlackRock, Inc. | 3.9% | 3,459,218 | $734M |
| 6 | FIL Ltd | 3.1% | 2,779,851 | $590M |
| 7 | JPMORGAN CHASE CO | 2.7% | 2,447,397 | $512M |
| 8 | GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC | 2.5% | 2,194,868 | $464M |
| 9 | AMERICAN CENTURY COMPANIES INC | 2.3% | 2,066,537 | $439M |
| 10 | BlackRock, Inc. | 2.3% | 2,013,829 | $427M |
Other Consumer Cyclical sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Packaging Corp Of America’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Packaging Corp Of America 2026 annual meeting?
- Packaging Corp Of America (PKG) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Tuesday, May 12, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Packaging Corp Of America 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Packaging Corp Of America 2026 meeting is Monday, March 16, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Packaging Corp Of America's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 9 director nominees at the Packaging Corp Of America 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Packaging Corp Of America 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Packaging Corp Of America 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.