Payoneer Global Inc
3 nominees · 3 ballot items.
Election of three Class II directors; Ratification of the selection of Kesselman & Kesselman (a PwC member firm) as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2026; and a non-binding advisory (say-on-pay) vote to approve the compensation paid to named executive officers.
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Payoneer Global Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot3
- 1
Election of Directors
ManagementBoard: FORElect three Class II nominees—John Caplan, Amir Goldman and Susanna Morgan—to serve one-year terms expiring at the 2027 annual meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.
- 2
Ratification of the Selection of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Payoneer
ManagementBoard: FORRatify the Audit Committee’s selection of Kesselman & Kesselman, a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited (PwC), as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.
- 3
Non-Binding Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation (Say-on-Pay
ManagementBoard: FORNon-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and related disclosures in the Proxy Statement.
More detail
This management proposal asks shareholders to cast a non-binding advisory vote approving the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and compensation tables. Management seeks this endorsement to validate its pay-for-performance approach, which emphasizes a substantial portion of at-risk compensation through annual cash bonuses tied to revenue excluding interest income and Adjusted EBITDA (both excluding interest income) and long‑term equity awards including newly introduced performance-based restricted stock units (PSUs). The Compensation Committee engaged an independent consultant (Compensia), used a peer group benchmarking process, and introduced PSUs in 2025 to strengthen alignment between executive pay and company performance; the PSUs convert based on one-year performance against revenue and Adjusted EBITDA targets and vest over multiple years to reinforce retention. The company highlights strong recent operational results (e.g., revenue growth, adjusted EBITDA outcomes, and other strategic achievements) and notes prior strong stockholder support for say-on-pay (approximately 93% approval in 2025), which informs the committee’s continued approach. The Board frames the vote as advisory—non-binding—while committing to consider the outcome and stockholder feedback when setting future compensation. From a governance perspective, the Compensation Committee is composed of independent directors and has implemented best practices such as clawback provisions, stock ownership guidelines, and use of an independent consultant, which management cites in support of the program. Key controversies for an analyst to weigh include the size and realized value of equity grants (significant grant‑date fair values and prior large awards), the level of severance/change-in-control protections and potential acceleration mechanics for PSUs and RSUs, and whether the one‑year performance window for PSUs sufficiently captures sustained long‑term value creation. In sum, the proposal is a request for non-binding endorsement of a compensation framework that emphasizes pay-for-performance and retention, but analysts should evaluate the calibration of performance measures, the quantum and vesting/acceleration mechanics of awards, and the recent execution and shareholder engagement context when assessing the merits of supporting management’s recommendation.
Nominees on the ballot3
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Technology Crossover Management VIII, Ltd. | 10.2% | 34,197,116 | $165M |
| 2 | BlackRock, Inc. | 8.8% | 29,365,465 | $142M |
| 3 | Susquehanna Capital Management, LLC | 4.6% | 15,285,037 | $74M |
| 4 | VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 4.4% | 14,730,702 | $71M |
| 5 | BNP Paribas Asset Management Holding S.A. | 4.0% | 13,522,552 | $65M |
| 6 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 3.7% | 12,543,777 | $61M |
| 7 | STATE STREET CORP | 3.3% | 10,932,799 | $53M |
| 8 | PRICE T ROWE ASSOCIATES INC /MD/ | 2.8% | 9,473,977 | $46M |
| 9 | BlackRock, Inc. | 2.3% | 7,840,135 | $38M |
| 10 | AMERICAN CENTURY COMPANIES INC | 2.3% | 7,648,738 | $37M |
Other Technology sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Payoneer Global Inc’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Payoneer Global Inc 2026 annual meeting?
- Payoneer Global Inc (PAYO) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Tuesday, June 9, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Payoneer Global Inc 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Payoneer Global Inc 2026 meeting is Monday, April 13, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Payoneer Global Inc's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 3 director nominees at the Payoneer Global Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Payoneer Global Inc 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Payoneer Global Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.