Par Technology Corp
7 nominees · 4 ballot items.
Elect seven directors; approve the Second Amended and Restated 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (increase shares by 2,000,000 and related amendments); non-binding advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation (Say-on-Pay); and ratify Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditors for fiscal 2026.
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Par Technology Corp’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot4
- 1
Election of Directors
ManagementBoard: FORElection of seven director nominees named in the proxy statement to serve until the 2027 annual meeting.
- 2
Approval of the Amended 2015 Equity Incentive Plan
ManagementBoard: FORApprove the Second Amended and Restated PAR Technology Corporation 2015 Equity Incentive Plan to increase authorized shares by 2,000,000, extend the plan term, prohibit liberal share recycling, and make other updates.
More detail
This management proposal asks shareholders to approve a Second Amended and Restated 2015 Equity Incentive Plan that principally increases the share reserve by 2,000,000 shares, extends the plan term to May 29, 2036, prohibits liberal share recycling, and imposes updated limits and clarifications (including non-employee director compensation limits and anti-repricing protections). Management seeks approval so the Compensation Committee retains capacity to grant equity awards necessary for attraction, retention, and long-term alignment of employees and directors with shareholder interests; the company projects current available shares could be depleted as early as the end of 2026. The proposal includes standard governance protections—clawback/recoupment provisions, anti-repricing without shareholder approval, change-in-control adjustment mechanics, and a prohibition on liberal share recycling—that the Board highlights to mitigate shareholder dilution and abuse. If approved, fully diluted overhang would increase from about 8.4% to approximately 12.3% based on April 8, 2026 figures; the company discloses a three-year average burn rate of 2.2%, which management uses to justify that the requested increase supports roughly one year of awards under expected grant practices. Key plan mechanics retain Board (and Compensation Committee) discretion over award terms, while adding registration and administrative updates; awards remain subject to tax withholding, transfer restrictions, and limits on incentive stock option treatment. The Board frames the amendment as necessary to sustain equity-based compensation programs that support execution of PAR’s SaaS-focused strategy and post-transaction integration activities, noting potential dilution but emphasizing disciplined use of the reserve. From a governance perspective, shareholders should weigh the dilution impact and the plan’s anti-recycling and anti-repricing commitments, along with the Board’s compensation governance (e.g., clawbacks and director limits) and the company’s historical burn and grant practices. The vote is a simple majority of votes cast and, while management recommends FOR, investors may compare the incremental overhang and historical grant cadence against peer practices when assessing the proposal.
- 3
Non-Binding Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers (Say-on-Pay Vote
ManagementBoard: FORNon-binding, advisory vote asking shareholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the company's named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement.
More detail
This non-binding advisory management proposal asks shareholders to approve the compensation paid to PAR’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and compensation tables. Management seeks this advisory approval to validate its pay-for-performance design, which emphasizes formulaic STI metrics (ARR and Adjusted EBITDA) and long-term equity largely tied to relative TSR (with PRSUs for the CEO and increasing PRSU usage for other NEOs beginning 2026). The company describes significant shareholder engagement after last year’s say-on-pay (which received ~79% support) and outlines changes made in response—such as rebalancing CEO equity to 50% PRSUs/50% time-vesting RSUs, limiting off-cycle grants, and adopting a larger PRSU component for non-CEO NEOs beginning in 2026—to strengthen alignment and retention. The vote is advisory and non-binding, but the Board and Compensation Committee state they will consider the outcome when making future compensation decisions. Management recommends a FOR vote on the grounds that the program aligns incentives with long-term shareholder value, includes clawback and ownership guidelines, and reflects investor feedback. Investors evaluating the proposal should consider the mix of pay elements, the use of relative TSR for PRSUs (including its peer-group selection), disclosure quality around target setting and outcomes, and recent actions taken by the Compensation Committee in response to investor outreach. Approval requires a majority of votes cast; a failure to receive support would likely prompt additional shareholder engagement and potential further changes to program design.
- 4
Ratification of Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2026
ManagementBoard: FORRatify the Audit Committee’s appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026.
Nominees on the ballot7
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Voss Capital, LP | 11.8% | 4,880,100 | $65M |
| 2 | Newtyn Management, LLC | 6.6% | 2,732,696 | $36M |
| 3 | T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc. | 6.3% | 2,612,424 | $35M |
| 4 | Progeny 3, Inc. | 5.3% | 2,170,808 | $29M |
| 5 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 4.3% | 1,787,652 | $24M |
| 6 | GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC | 4.3% | 1,762,004 | $23M |
| 7 | BlackRock, Inc. | 3.9% | 1,615,504 | $22M |
| 8 | MARSHALL WACE, LLP | 3.8% | 1,547,645 | $21M |
| 9 | Capital Research Global Investors | 3.6% | 1,475,268 | $20M |
| 10 | FMR LLC | 3.4% | 1,413,744 | $19M |
Other Technology sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Par Technology Corp’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Par Technology Corp 2026 annual meeting?
- Par Technology Corp (PAR) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Friday, May 29, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Par Technology Corp 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Par Technology Corp 2026 meeting is Wednesday, April 8, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Par Technology Corp's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 7 director nominees at the Par Technology Corp 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Par Technology Corp 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 4 proposals at the Par Technology Corp 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.