Liquidia Corp
3 nominees · 3 ballot items.
Elect three Class II directors (Katie Rielly-Gauvin, Ramandeep Singh, and David Johnson) for three-year terms; ratify PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2026; and approve, in a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation of the company’s named executive officers.
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Liquidia Corp’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot3
- 1
Election of Three Class II Directors
ManagementBoard: FORElect three Class II directors — Katie Rielly-Gauvin, Ramandeep Singh, and David Johnson — to serve three-year terms expiring at the 2029 annual meeting.
- 2
Ratify Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2026
ManagementBoard: FORRatify the Audit Committee’s appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Liquidia’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2026.
- 3
Advisory Vote on the Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers (Say-on-Pay
ManagementBoard: FORA non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of the company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement.
More detail
This non-binding advisory proposal asks shareholders to approve the company’s disclosed 2025 compensation for its named executive officers (NEOs). Management is seeking approval to reaffirm its compensation philosophy — which it describes as pay-for-performance, market-competitive, and aligned with long-term stockholder interests through equity awards — and to validate the decisions of the Compensation Committee. The proposal is contextualized by a very strong 2025 operational year: FDA approval and commercial launch of YUTREPIA, rapid revenue growth, early profitability, and a Compensation Committee-approved maximum (200%) payout under the annual bonus plan. Material elements driving the 2025 compensation outcome included large RSU/PSU awards (with PSUs conditioned on the first commercial sale of YUTREPIA, a milestone the company achieved), time-based vesting, and a cash bonus program that delivered at the maximum level based on overachievement of corporate goals. The Compensation Committee engaged an independent consultant (FW Cook), used peer benchmarking, and certified that the company’s pay practices and governance (including a clawback policy and review of risks) are appropriate, which the Board cites as rationale for its FOR recommendation. Because the vote is advisory, it does not bind the Board but provides important stockholder feedback that the Board and Compensation Committee will consider in future compensation determinations. From a governance perspective, the company frames this as confirmation that its executive pay structure supported the launch and commercialization priorities and was necessary to attract, retain and motivate leadership during a transformational commercial year. Potential investor concerns include the scale of equity awards and high bonus payouts in a short period; management’s counter-argument is that payouts were earned via pre‑specified performance measures tied to commercial and pipeline milestones and that equity grants align executives’ interests with long-term value creation. Investors evaluating the proposal should weigh the demonstrable operational outcomes in 2025 against ongoing oversight, the non-binding nature of the vote, and whether the disclosed pay practices appropriately calibrate risk and long-term alignment.
Nominees on the ballot3
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FARALLON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLCActivist | 9.7% | 8,656,038 | $327M |
| 2 | Caligan Partners LPActivist | 9.1% | 8,118,892 | $306M |
| 3 | FINDELL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 3.9% | 3,502,112 | $132M |
| 4 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 3.3% | 2,926,945 | $110M |
| 5 | BlackRock, Inc. | 3.1% | 2,793,235 | $105M |
| 6 | Opaleye Management Inc. | 2.9% | 2,545,000 | $89M |
| 7 | BlackRock, Inc. | 2.2% | 1,959,070 | $74M |
| 8 | STATE STREET CORP | 2.1% | 1,881,599 | $71M |
| 9 | GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC | 1.9% | 1,692,848 | $64M |
| 10 | MPM BioImpact LLC | 1.6% | 1,405,158 | $53M |
Other Healthcare sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Liquidia Corp’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Liquidia Corp 2026 annual meeting?
- Liquidia Corp (LQDA) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Tuesday, June 16, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Liquidia Corp 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Liquidia Corp 2026 meeting is Monday, April 20, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Liquidia Corp's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 3 director nominees at the Liquidia Corp 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Liquidia Corp 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Liquidia Corp 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.