Lemonade Inc
2 nominees · 3 ballot items.
Elect two Class III directors (Michael Eisenberg and Debra Schwartz); ratify Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors for 2026; and approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of the named executive officers (Say-on-Pay).
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Lemonade Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot3
- 1
Election of Directors
ManagementBoard: FORElect Michael Eisenberg and Debra Schwartz as Class III Directors to serve until the 2029 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
- 2
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
ManagementBoard: FORRatify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Lemonade’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.
- 3
Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officer Compensation (Say-on-Pay
ManagementBoard: FORA non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative.
More detail
This proposal asks stockholders to cast a non-binding advisory vote to approve the Company’s named executive officer compensation as disclosed in the proxy, commonly known as a Say-on-Pay vote. Management frames the vote as a vehicle for stockholders to express their views on overall executive pay rather than any single element, and the Board and Compensation Committee state they will consider the advisory outcome when making future compensation decisions. The Company’s 2025 compensation program places substantial emphasis on equity-based awards (about 88% of named executive officers’ target compensation in 2025), designed to align executives with long‑term shareholder value through stock options and RSUs; equity vesting schedules and severance/change-in-control protections are intended to promote retention. The proxy discloses that the Compensation Committee relied on an independent consultant (Aon) and a peer group to benchmark pay, and describes governance safeguards including a clawback policy, independent Compensation Committee membership, and limits on hedging and pledging. Company performance in 2025 showed material revenue and IFP growth (gross written premium +26%, total revenue +40%) and an improved gross loss ratio, which management uses to justify its pay-for-performance alignment even as the company remains net loss-making. Because the vote is advisory, approval would not alter compensation contracts directly but would validate the Board’s approach and likely reinforce continuation of the current compensation design; a negative result would likely trigger additional investor outreach and potential redesign. A material consideration for sophisticated evaluators is the tension between heavy equity weighting (which ties pay to stock performance) and the volatility of equity valuations—this amplifies sensitivity of “compensation actually paid” to market moves and grant timing. Overall, the Board recommends FOR on the grounds of alignment, retention, market benchmarking, and responsiveness to investor feedback, but analysts should weigh past stock-price-driven swings in reported compensation against operating metrics when assessing whether pay is economically aligned with long-term shareholder value.
Nominees on the ballot2
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 3.9% | 3,018,092 | $189M |
| 2 | VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 3.9% | 2,981,857 | $187M |
| 3 | BlackRock, Inc. | 3.0% | 2,270,381 | $142M |
| 4 | BlackRock, Inc. | 2.5% | 1,918,903 | $120M |
| 5 | BAILLIE GIFFORD CO | 2.3% | 1,744,886 | $109M |
| 6 | STATE STREET CORP | 2.0% | 1,554,499 | $97M |
| 7 | GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC | 1.9% | 1,495,774 | $94M |
| 8 | JPMORGAN CHASE CO | 1.8% | 1,363,355 | $80M |
| 9 | JPMORGAN CHASE CO | 1.4% | 1,063,481 | $62M |
| 10 | TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP | 1.2% | 948,554 | $59M |
Other Financial Services sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Lemonade Inc’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Lemonade Inc 2026 annual meeting?
- Lemonade Inc (LMND) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Wednesday, June 3, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Lemonade Inc 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Lemonade Inc 2026 meeting is Thursday, April 9, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Lemonade Inc's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 2 director nominees at the Lemonade Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Lemonade Inc 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Lemonade Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.