Boardroom Alpha
Meeting calendar
LLYVA · Annual meeting · Monday, May 11, 2026

Liberty Live Holdings Inc

1 nominee · 4 ballot items.

Election of Bill Kurtz as Class I director; ratification of KPMG LLP as independent auditors for 2026; advisory approval of named executive officer compensation (say-on-pay); and advisory selection of the frequency for future say-on-pay votes (say-on-frequency).

Market cap
$9.1B
1Y TSR
+24.2%
Board grade
C+
Record date
Mar 23, 2026
Filing
DEF 14A
Meeting concluded · May 11, 2026

Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Liberty Live Holdings Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.

Proposals

On the ballot4

  1. 1

    The Election of Director Proposal

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Elect Bill Kurtz to continue serving as a Class I member of the Board until the 2029 annual meeting of stockholders or his earlier resignation or removal.

  2. 2

    The Auditors Ratification Proposal

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as Liberty Live Holdings' independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.

  3. 3

    The Say-on-Pay Proposal

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    An advisory (non-binding) vote to approve the compensation of the company's named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement (Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and related narrative).

    More detail

    This management proposal asks shareholders to cast a non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation paid to the company's named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy materials. Management is seeking this advisory approval to obtain stockholder feedback on its executive pay philosophy and to confirm alignment between pay and long-term company value creation; the company notes this is the first such vote since the Split-Off. The proposal is purely advisory under Section 14A of the Exchange Act, so the Board and compensation committee will consider the outcome but are not legally required to implement it. The Board recommends voting FOR the proposal, stating that the compensation structure is designed to motivate executives toward long-term performance and is aligned with company objectives. Key context includes the company's reliance on Liberty Media for management services and that many executive pay elements (including equity awards) were granted by Liberty Media and substituted in connection with the Split-Off, which may affect perceptions of pay allocation and incentives. The proposal aggregates the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, all compensation tables and related narrative, so a vote FOR effectively signals acceptance of both the design and disclosure of pay practices. Institutional investors and proxy advisors typically evaluate such proposals based on pay-for-performance alignment, disclosure quality, and any material related-party arrangements; here the company highlights long-term, equity-based incentives and clawback/recoupment provisions. Given the advisory nature, a strong affirmative vote would validate current practices and reduce the likelihood of near-term pay-policy changes, while a weak vote would likely trigger enhanced shareholder engagement and potential changes to the pay program or disclosures. Management’s recommendation emphasizes long-term alignment, but voters should weigh the governance implications of the services agreement with Liberty Media, substituted equity awards from the Split-Off, and detailed pay-versus-performance metrics disclosed in the filing.

  4. 4

    The Say-on-Frequency Proposal

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    An advisory (non-binding) vote to choose the frequency—one year, two years, or three years—at which future advisory say-on-pay votes will be held; the Board recommends a three-year interval.

    More detail

    This management proposal asks shareholders to select, on an advisory basis, how often the company should hold future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation—options are once every one, two, or three years. The Board has evaluated the alternatives and recommends the three-year option, arguing that a triennial cadence aligns with the company’s long-term compensation philosophy and gives sufficient time to evaluate mid- to long-term performance outcomes tied to equity and multi-year incentive awards. Management frames the three-year option as reducing undue focus on short-term payouts and enabling more meaningful assessment of whether compensation is linked to sustained company performance; it also says a three-year interval affords time to consider and implement any changes after stockholder feedback. Because this vote is advisory, the Board retains discretion and may choose a different frequency if it believes that is in the best interests of the company and its stockholders, but it will carefully consider the stockholder vote. The context includes the recent Split-Off from Liberty Media, substituted equity awards with multi-year vesting schedules, and the services agreement that affects how executive compensation costs are allocated—factors that make a longer frequency attractive to management. Institutional voters and proxy advisors often have preferences on frequency (many favor annual votes for regular accountability, while others favor triennial for focus on long-term metrics); a three-year recommendation may therefore draw scrutiny from some governance-focused investors. A shareholder majority for a given frequency will be the Board’s primary indicator of stockholder preference, but because the vote is non-binding, a divergence between stockholder preference and Board action could prompt engagement or criticism. Investors evaluating this proposal should weigh whether the chosen cadence permits appropriate responsiveness to evolving compensation practices and performance, given the company’s strategic emphasis on long-term value creation.

Director elections

Nominees on the ballot1

Ownership

Top institutional holders10

Latest 13F quarter
1BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC3.6%3,284,775$301M
2Linonia Partnership LP2.7%2,498,950$229M
3ValueAct Holdings, L.P.Activist1.9%1,777,075$163M
4BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/1.9%1,768,002$162M
5Amundi1.4%1,309,994$120M
6MORGAN STANLEY1.4%1,254,881$115M
7Sculptor Capital LP1.2%1,100,000$101M
8BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC1.1%1,011,698$93M
9Corvex Management LPActivist1.1%1,005,434$92M
10VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC1.1%974,101$89M
Filings

Recent key filings

Periodic reports
Definitive proxies
Peers

Other Communication Services sector meetings6

Nearest market cap

Upcoming shareholder meetings at Liberty Live Holdings Inc’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.

Reference

Frequently asked questions

When is the Liberty Live Holdings Inc 2026 annual meeting?
Liberty Live Holdings Inc (LLYVA) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Monday, May 11, 2026.
What is the record date for the Liberty Live Holdings Inc 2026 meeting?
The record date for the Liberty Live Holdings Inc 2026 meeting is Monday, March 23, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
Who are the director nominees for Liberty Live Holdings Inc's 2026 meeting?
The board is presenting 1 director nominee at the Liberty Live Holdings Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Liberty Live Holdings Inc 2026 meeting?
Shareholders will vote on 4 proposals at the Liberty Live Holdings Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
Disclaimer

The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.

This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.

None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.

No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.

Full disclaimer