Boardroom Alpha
Meeting calendar
KRYS · Annual meeting · Friday, May 15, 2026

Krystal Biotech Inc

2 nominees · 4 ballot items.

Elect two Class III directors; ratify KPMG LLP as independent auditors; approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of named executive officers; and approve the Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy (including the 2026 Program) pursuant to the settlement governance requirements.

Market cap
$10.5B
1Y TSR
+141.5%
Board grade
B
Record date
Mar 23, 2026
Filing
DEF 14A
Meeting concluded · May 15, 2026

Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Krystal Biotech Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.

Proposals

On the ballot4

  1. 1

    Election of Class III Directors

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Elect the two Class III director nominees, Krish S. Krishnan and Christopher Mason, each to serve a three-year term expiring at the 2029 annual meeting.

  2. 2

    Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.

  3. 3

    Non-Binding, Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officer Compensation

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    A non-binding, advisory (say-on-pay) vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the Proxy Statement.

    More detail

    This proposal asks shareholders to cast an advisory "say-on-pay" vote approving the overall compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy. Management is seeking this advisory approval to confirm that its executive compensation philosophy—emphasizing a mix of base salary, performance-based annual cash bonuses tied to corporate and individual objectives, and long-term equity incentives (options and RSUs)—is aligned with stockholder expectations and Company performance. The Company highlights that a large portion of NEO pay is “at risk” and tied to long-term stock price performance to align management incentives with stockholders. Contextually, the Company previously received strong support in its 2024 say-on-pay vote (over 96% support), and the Compensation Committee uses market data and an independent consultant to set pay levels and peer benchmarking. Although advisory and non-binding, the Board will review the outcome and take it into consideration when making future compensation decisions; thus, the vote functions as a governance signal rather than creating contractual entitlements. The Company frames the program as calibrated to attract and retain executives, reward achievement of operational and strategic goals (including commercial performance of VYJUVEK and pipeline advancement), and limit excessive risk-taking via multi-year vesting, clawback provisions, and other safeguards. The Board recommends a vote FOR, asserting the compensation is reasonable, performance-linked, and market competitive; however, shareholders should note the advisory nature of the vote and that the Compensation Committee retains discretion to modify programs. Given the Company’s commercial launch progress and material revenue growth in 2025, management argues the compensation structure appropriately balances short- and long-term incentives to drive sustainable value creation. Analysts assessing the proposal should weigh the robustness of disclosure, the high proportion of equity-based pay, prior shareholder support, and governance mechanisms (independent committee, consultant, clawback policy) in judging whether approval signals effective alignment between pay and performance.

  4. 4

    Approval of the Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Approve the Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy (attached as Appendix A), which sets the 2026 Program for cash retainers and equity awards for non-employee directors and governance procedures tied to a proposed derivative settlement.

    More detail

    This management proposal asks shareholders to approve a formal Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy (the Compensation Policy) and the affiliated 2026 Program detailing cash retainers and equity awards for non-employee directors. Management is seeking shareholder approval both to formalize a market-competitive board compensation program (50th percentile positioning) and to satisfy a condition of a proposed settlement of a derivative litigation alleging excessive director compensation; the policy’s effectiveness requires both stockholder approval and court approval of the settlement. The 2026 Program sets a $50,000 base annual board retainer, supplemental retainers for committee chairs/members, a $40,000 lead director retainer, and annual equity awards targeted at $400,000 grant-date value (60% options/40% RSUs) with special initial grants for new directors and multi-year vesting; the Policy contemplates retaining an independent consultant and annual peer benchmarking, and allows the Board to increase compensation up to the 75th percentile in future years within the Settlement Governance Period without additional stockholder votes. The board recommends FOR, arguing the Policy promotes transparency, helps attract and retain qualified directors, and fulfills commitments under the settlement to enhance disclosure and submit the policy to a vote. Significant contextual governance considerations include the derivative suit (Corbin v. Janney et al.) and the fact that votes by non-employee directors and certain litigation defendants are excluded from the tally; effectiveness is also conditioned on Delaware Court approval of the settlement. If not approved, the Company states directors will not receive compensation under the Policy until both stockholder and court approvals occur and the Company may present another proposed plan for a future vote. For sophisticated evaluation, analysts should weigh the settlement-driven need for this vote, the reasonableness of the 2026 Program relative to peers, the limits on future increases during the Settlement Governance Period, the exclusion of certain votes, and potential governance optics related to director compensation litigation when judging whether the policy aligns with long-term stockholder interests.

Director elections

Nominees on the ballot2

Ownership

Top institutional holders10

Latest 13F quarter
1FMR LLC11.3%3,318,705$857M
2Avoro Capital Advisors LLC9.8%2,888,888$746M
3BlackRock, Inc.9.6%2,840,780$734M
4VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC4.9%1,456,727$376M
5STATE STREET CORP4.5%1,314,434$340M
6VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC4.0%1,165,324$301M
7Soleus Capital Management, L.P.3.9%1,153,087$298M
8FMR LLC3.6%1,048,267$271M
9Capital World Investors2.8%824,720$213M
10BlackRock, Inc.2.5%749,447$194M
Filings

Recent key filings

Periodic reports
Definitive proxies
Reference

Frequently asked questions

When is the Krystal Biotech Inc 2026 annual meeting?
Krystal Biotech Inc (KRYS) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Friday, May 15, 2026.
What is the record date for the Krystal Biotech Inc 2026 meeting?
The record date for the Krystal Biotech Inc 2026 meeting is Monday, March 23, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
Who are the director nominees for Krystal Biotech Inc's 2026 meeting?
The board is presenting 2 director nominees at the Krystal Biotech Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Krystal Biotech Inc 2026 meeting?
Shareholders will vote on 4 proposals at the Krystal Biotech Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
Disclaimer

The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.

This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.

None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.

No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.

Full disclaimer