Boardroom Alpha
Meeting calendar
GO · Annual meeting · Monday, June 1, 2026

Grocery Outlet Holding Corp

10 nominees · 4 ballot items.

Election of ten directors; ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditors for fiscal 2026; non-binding advisory approval of executive compensation (“Say-on-Pay”); and a non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation (Board recommends every year).

Market cap
$934M
1Y TSR
-27.1%
Board grade
C-
Record date
Apr 7, 2026
Filing
DEF 14A
Meeting concluded · Jun 1, 2026

Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Grocery Outlet Holding Corp’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.

Proposals

On the ballot4

  1. 1

    Election of Ten Directors to Serve until the 2027 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Elect ten nominees to the Board to serve one-year terms until the 2027 annual meeting.

  2. 2

    Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal Year 2026

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Ratify the Audit and Risk Committee’s appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026.

  3. 3

    Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation paid to the Company’s Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the proxy statement.

    More detail

    This advisory Say-on-Pay proposal asks stockholders to approve, on a non-binding basis, the Company’s executive compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and accompanying narrative. Management seeks this approval to validate its pay-for-performance philosophy, which emphasizes that a substantial portion of Named Executive Officers’ target compensation is “at risk” and tied to both annual operational metrics (adjusted EBITDA, comparable store sales and certain operational goals) and multi-year equity performance awards (PSUs tied to cumulative net sales and adjusted EPS and stock options that require price appreciation). The Company recently revised its equity mix to increase alignment with stockholders by replacing time‑based RSUs with stock options and PSUs, and adjusted AIP metrics to add operational goals to reinforce near-term operational improvements; these design choices reflect management’s intent to align incentives with restoring profitability and operational execution after a challenging fiscal year. The Board is recommending a FOR vote and explains that actual FY2025 payouts were substantially below target (AIP paid at 42.1% of target and Fiscal Year 2023 PSU payouts at 53% of target), signaling rigorous performance-based outcomes rather than guaranteed pay, and that changes to FY2026 program further tie compensation to stock-price-linked PSU performance and retention-focused RSUs. In making its recommendation, the Board and the Compensation Committee relied on benchmarking from an independent consultant (Korn Ferry), stockholder engagement, and a view that the structure balances short-term remediation priorities with long-term shareholder alignment. The advisory nature of the vote means it is non-binding, but the Board commits to consider stockholder feedback; historically the Company has held annual say-on-pay votes and uses results and engagement input to inform compensation decisions. Given recent operational underperformance, the proposal represents management’s effort to secure stockholder endorsement of an incentive framework intended to drive execution, align management with stockholder returns over time, and retain key leaders during a turnaround.

  4. 4

    Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Non-binding advisory vote to indicate whether advisory votes on executive compensation should be held every one, two, or three years (Board recommends every year).

    More detail

    This non-binding frequency proposal asks stockholders to indicate how often the Company should present advisory Say‑on‑Pay votes to stockholders (options: one year, two years, three years, or abstain). Management and the Board advocate for an annual frequency, arguing that yearly votes provide the most regular and direct mechanism for stockholders to express views on executive compensation design and to hold the Board and management accountable for pay decisions in light of evolving company performance and strategic priorities. The Board’s recommendation is informed by the prior stockholder preference for annual votes, ongoing stockholder engagement, and the Company’s recent leadership and compensation changes (including new CEO and revised equity constructs) that the Board believes warrant frequent feedback. From a governance perspective, an annual vote increases transparency and allows relatively rapid response to changes in compensation programs, which is particularly relevant given the Company’s operational reset and emphasis on aligning incentives with restored profitability and stock-price performance. Opponents of annual frequency sometimes argue that multi‑year votes can better align with long-term incentive cycles and reduce administrative burden; the Company has attempted to address that concern by structuring long‑term PSUs and multi‑year equity grants while still seeking annual shareholder input on overall program design. Because the vote is advisory, stockholder outcomes will guide the Board but will not bind it; the Board states it will carefully review voting results and consider stockholder feedback in adjusting compensation practices. The proposed annual cadence should be assessed by investors in the context of Grocery Outlet’s near-term operational turnaround efforts, recent executive transitions, and the Compensation Committee’s ongoing use of external benchmarking and clawback/vesting protections to mitigate misalignment or excessive risk.

Director elections

Nominees on the ballot10

Independent
Tenure on this board
0.3 yrs
Also a director at
Brinker International Inc (EAT)
Independent
Tenure on this board
6.7 yrs
Also a director at
Equity Residential (EQR)
Independent
Tenure on this board
1.1 yrs
Also a director at
Sally Beauty Holdings Inc (SBH)Brc Inc (BRCC)
Independent
Tenure on this board
0.3 yrs
Also a director at
Floor & Decor Holdings Inc (FND)
Ownership

Top institutional holders10

Latest 13F quarter
1T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc.18.8%18,633,810$131M
2BlackRock, Inc.10.5%10,344,734$73M
3VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC6.1%6,034,912$43M
4STATE STREET CORP4.6%4,529,039$32M
5VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC4.2%4,125,522$29M
6FMR LLC3.4%3,341,779$24M
7BlackRock, Inc.3.1%3,035,703$21M
8DIMENSIONAL FUND ADVISORS LP2.9%2,849,804$20M
9BECKER CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC2.6%2,577,463$18M
10MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC2.6%2,523,171$18M
Filings

Recent key filings

Periodic reports
Definitive proxies
Reference

Frequently asked questions

When is the Grocery Outlet Holding Corp 2026 annual meeting?
Grocery Outlet Holding Corp (GO) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Monday, June 1, 2026.
What is the record date for the Grocery Outlet Holding Corp 2026 meeting?
The record date for the Grocery Outlet Holding Corp 2026 meeting is Tuesday, April 7, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
Who are the director nominees for Grocery Outlet Holding Corp's 2026 meeting?
The board is presenting 10 director nominees at the Grocery Outlet Holding Corp 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Grocery Outlet Holding Corp 2026 meeting?
Shareholders will vote on 4 proposals at the Grocery Outlet Holding Corp 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
Disclaimer

The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.

This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.

None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.

No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.

Full disclaimer