Boardroom Alpha
Meeting calendar
FAF · Annual meeting · Tuesday, May 12, 2026

First American Financial Corp

3 nominees · 5 ballot items.

Election of three Class I directors; advisory approval of executive compensation (Say on Pay); approval of amendments to eliminate supermajority voting requirements in the Certificate of Incorporation; approval of amendments to declassify the Board and phase-in annual director elections; and ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2026.

Market cap
$7.4B
1Y TSR
+21.4%
Board grade
C
Record date
Mar 16, 2026
Filing
DEF 14A
Meeting concluded · May 12, 2026

Follow how the vote landed and what changed on First American Financial Corp’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.

Proposals

On the ballot5

  1. 1

    Election of Class I Directors

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Elect three Class I director nominees (Mark E. Seaton, Marsha A. Spence, Deborah L. Wahl) to serve three-year terms expiring at the 2029 annual meeting.

  2. 2

    Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Non-binding, advisory vote (Say on Pay) to approve the Company’s 2025 executive compensation as disclosed in the proxy statement.

    More detail

    This advisory 'Say on Pay' proposal asks shareholders to approve, on a non-binding basis, the Company’s executive compensation disclosures and programs for the named executive officers as presented in the proxy materials. Management and the Compensation Committee are seeking shareholder affirmation of the overall pay program to validate their continued approach of a pay-for-performance mix that shifts a substantial portion of compensation toward at-risk incentives and equity. The Compensation Committee cites strong 2025 financial results and significant achievement against incentive metrics (142% payout on AIP and LTI PRSU payouts at 137% for the 2023 performance period) as evidence that compensation was aligned with performance. The vote is advisory and non-binding, but the Committee will review the voting outcome and consider it in future compensation design and engagement. The context includes continued stockholder outreach, a recent leadership transition, and use of multi-year performance awards (rTSR PRSUs and time-vesting RSUs) intended to balance short- and long-term incentives. Management emphasizes rigorous target setting, use of two financial metrics (pretax margin and return on equity) for annual incentives, and the Committee’s discretion to adjust payouts for extraordinary items or strategic initiatives. A shareholder approval would be interpreted by management as endorsement of current pay practices and support for continuity in incentive structures; significant dissent could prompt reconsideration of plan design or increased engagement. The Board recommends FOR the proposal because it believes the compensation structure aligns executives’ interests with long-term stockholder value, is supported by prior shareholder votes, and produced measurable performance outcomes in 2025.

  3. 3

    Approval of Amendments to Eliminate the Supermajority Voting Requirements in the Certificate of Incorporation

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Approve amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation (the 'Supermajority Amendments') to replace existing 66 2/3% supermajority voting thresholds with a majority of shares outstanding for specific provisions (director removal for cause, certain Certificate amendments, and Bylaws amendments).

    More detail

    This management proposal seeks shareholder approval to amend the Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate three defined supermajority voting requirements (currently set at 66 2/3%) and replace them with a majority of outstanding shares requirement for specified actions: removal of directors outside the annual meeting process, amendments to specified Certificate provisions, and amendments to the Bylaws. Management advances this change as responsive to the prior year’s shareholder advisory outcome and ongoing engagement, arguing that majority voting better aligns governance with current market practice and shareholder expectations while preserving the Board’s ability to consider fiduciary duties in implementation. The proposal would lower entrenched voting thresholds, thereby making it procedurally easier for stockholders to effect certain governance changes in the future; however, the Board retains discretion not to implement the amendments even if approved, in the event it deems implementation inconsistent with its fiduciary duties. The recommended change is framed as improving corporate governance alignment with the investor community following a non-binding stockholder request in 2025, and the Board emphasizes continuity by making conforming Bylaws changes contingent on stockholder approval. From a governance analysis perspective, reducing supermajority barriers can increase accountability and responsiveness to majority shareholder views but also reduces protections against abrupt changes driven by short-term coalitions; management’s retained implementation discretion and continued public disclosure provide a modicum of procedural safeguards. The filing includes the precise proposed amendment language in Appendix B, enabling shareholders to evaluate the legal effect. Approval requires a 66 2/3% affirmative vote under the existing Certificate provision; therefore, even if a majority of votes cast supports the change, the amendment may fail unless the supermajority threshold is met. The Board recommends FOR the amendment because it believes this change reflects stockholder sentiment and aligns the Company’s governance with prevailing market norms while allowing the Board to exercise judgment on timing and implementation.

  4. 4

    Approval of Amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation to Declassify the Board and Phase-In Annual Director Elections

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Approve amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation to phase-in declassification of the Board over three years, transitioning from staggered three-year terms to annual director elections by 2029, with transitional provisions for vacancies and director removal.

    More detail

    This proposal asks shareholders to approve amendments that will declassify the Board over a three-year phased schedule (directors in Class II first subject to annual election in 2027, Class III in 2028, and Class I in 2029), resulting in annual director elections beginning in 2029. Management frames the change as a response to investor preferences for annual elections to increase director accountability and to align the Company’s governance with current market practices; however, the Board chose a phased approach to preserve continuity and institutional knowledge during the transition. The amendments also adjust removal provisions: prior to full declassification directors remain removable only for cause, but following completion of declassification directors may be removed with or without cause (consistent with Delaware law), and the vote required to remove directors is reduced to a majority. The Board emphasizes that the amendments will not shorten existing director terms and provides transitional rules for filling newly created seats and vacancies to maintain orderly governance. From a governance risk/benefit perspective, declassification increases shareholder oversight and responsiveness but reduces defensive protections against rapid board turnover; the three-year phase-in mitigates disruption risk by staggering the change. The proposal requires a 66 2/3% affirmative vote under the existing Certificate; even if a majority of votes cast support the amendment, the supermajority threshold may present a practical hurdle. The Board recommends FOR the proposal because it believes declassification enhances alignment with investor expectations while the phased implementation preserves board stability and continuity during the transition.

  5. 5

    Ratification of Selection of Independent Auditor

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.

Director elections

Nominees on the ballot3

Ownership

Top institutional holders10

Latest 13F quarter
1FMR LLC7.5%7,541,233$455M
2BlackRock, Inc.5.5%5,591,364$337M
3VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC5.2%5,215,995$314M
4Boston Partners4.5%4,502,915$271M
5VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC4.3%4,390,390$265M
6DIMENSIONAL FUND ADVISORS LP4.3%4,367,888$263M
7ARIEL INVESTMENTS, LLC3.6%3,639,718$219M
8STATE STREET CORP3.2%3,265,574$197M
9BlackRock, Inc.2.9%2,978,260$180M
10Capital World Investors1.9%1,870,000$113M
Filings

Recent key filings

Periodic reports
Definitive proxies
Reference

Frequently asked questions

When is the First American Financial Corp 2026 annual meeting?
First American Financial Corp (FAF) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Tuesday, May 12, 2026.
What is the record date for the First American Financial Corp 2026 meeting?
The record date for the First American Financial Corp 2026 meeting is Monday, March 16, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
Who are the director nominees for First American Financial Corp's 2026 meeting?
The board is presenting 3 director nominees at the First American Financial Corp 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
What proposals will shareholders vote on at the First American Financial Corp 2026 meeting?
Shareholders will vote on 5 proposals at the First American Financial Corp 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
Disclaimer

The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.

This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.

None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.

No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.

Full disclaimer