Exponent Inc
6 nominees · 3 ballot items.
Elect six directors to the Board; ratify KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm; and approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the fiscal 2025 compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Exponent Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot3
- 1
Election of Directors
ManagementBoard: FORElect six directors to the Board of Directors to serve until the next annual meeting or until their successors are elected and qualified.
- 2
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
ManagementBoard: FORRatify the Audit Committee’s appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 1, 2027.
- 3
Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation for Fiscal 2025
ManagementBoard: FORNon-binding, advisory vote to approve the fiscal 2025 compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement.
More detail
This proposal asks shareholders to cast a non-binding advisory vote to approve the overall fiscal 2025 compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy materials. Management is seeking shareholder endorsement to confirm that its compensation framework — which emphasizes alignment of pay with long-term stockholder interests through a mix of base salary, cash bonuses tied to company performance, equity awards (including restricted stock units and options), and significant retention features (e.g., four-year cliff vesting and required stock ownership guidelines) — is acceptable to investors. The Company highlights specific design elements intended to link pay and performance: quantitative CEO performance targets for revenue and adjusted EBITDAS margin, a qualitative CEO bonus component, an annual bonus pool tied to pre-tax income, and the settlement of 40% of annual bonuses in fully vested restricted stock units to encourage longer-term alignment. The Human Resources Committee uses peer benchmarking and consultant input, and the Company points to strong prior say-on-pay support (approximately 95.7% in 2025) as evidence that shareholders have previously endorsed the program. Management also notes governance safeguards such as a clawback policy for incentive-based compensation, limitations on hedging and pledging, and pre-approval of audit and compensation consultants to mitigate conflicts and risk-taking. Because the vote is advisory, a favorable outcome would not be binding but would signal investor approval and inform the Committee’s future compensation decisions; a negative outcome would prompt the Committee to consider changes to address stockholder concerns. The Board’s unanimous recommendation to vote FOR is grounded in management’s view that the program effectively balances retention, performance incentives, and long-term alignment while controlling excessive risk through program design. Key evaluation points for an analyst include: the transparency and rigor of the quantitative targets, the size and mix of short- versus long-term incentives (including the impact of using fully vested RSUs as part of bonuses), the independence and process used by the Human Resources Committee and its advisors, and historical shareholder support which may limit the immediacy of required changes but does not obviate the need to respond to evolving investor expectations and regulatory guidance.
Nominees on the ballot6
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BlackRock, Inc. | 7.9% | 3,820,976 | $249M |
| 2 | VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 6.1% | 2,946,756 | $192M |
| 3 | KAYNE ANDERSON RUDNICK INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC | 5.9% | 2,843,638 | $186M |
| 4 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 4.6% | 2,210,650 | $144M |
| 5 | Conestoga Capital Advisors, LLC | 3.9% | 1,906,505 | $124M |
| 6 | STATE STREET CORP | 3.9% | 1,889,536 | $123M |
| 7 | BlackRock, Inc. | 3.3% | 1,581,526 | $103M |
| 8 | GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC | 2.9% | 1,418,328 | $93M |
| 9 | GENEVA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 2.6% | 1,284,804 | $84M |
| 10 | ROYCE ASSOCIATES LP | 2.4% | 1,144,873 | $75M |
Other Industrials sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Exponent Inc’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Exponent Inc 2026 annual meeting?
- Exponent Inc (EXPO) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Thursday, June 4, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Exponent Inc 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Exponent Inc 2026 meeting is Wednesday, April 8, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Exponent Inc's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 6 director nominees at the Exponent Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Exponent Inc 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Exponent Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.