Epr Properties
10 nominees · 3 ballot items.
Shareholders will (1) elect ten trustees to the Board, (2) vote on a non-binding advisory approval of the named executive officers’ compensation (say-on-pay), and (3) ratify KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2026.
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Epr Properties’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot3
- 1
Election of Trustees
ManagementBoard: FORElect ten trustee nominees (Peter C. Brown, William P. Brown, John P. Case III, James B. Connor, Virginia E. Shanks, Gregory K. Silvers, Robin P. Sterneck, John Peter Suarez, Lisa G. Trimberger and Caixia Y. Ziegler) to serve one-year terms until the next annual meeting or until their successors are elected and qualified.
- 2
Advisory Vote to Approve NEO Compensation (Say-on-Pay
ManagementBoard: FORNon-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy materials.
More detail
This proposal requests a non-binding, annual advisory vote approving the named executive officers’ (NEOs’) compensation as disclosed in the proxy. Management is seeking shareholder ratification to confirm that its pay program — which emphasizes at-risk compensation through an Annual Incentive Program (AIP) and a Long-Term Incentive (LTI) program comprised of restricted shares and performance share units (PSUs) — is aligned with shareholder interests and effective for retention. The AIP for 2025 weighted FFO, as adjusted per share (50%), investment spending (30%) and personal objectives (20%), with an incentive (150% valuation) for executives to take awards as restricted shares; the LTI focuses on relative TSR versus a triple-net peer group and the MSCI US REIT Index and AFFO per share growth, with multi-year performance periods and vesting. The board points to recent strong shareholder support (approximately 92% favorable in prior years), use of an independent compensation consultant, enhanced ownership guidelines, and governance features (clawback policy, anti-hedging/anti-pledging, no tax gross-ups for change-in-control) as reasons to support the program. Notably, PSUs can pay out zero if AFFO growth thresholds are not met, demonstrating downside alignment with company performance; conversely, PSUs have previously paid above target when relative TSR exceeded peers. Potential investor concerns include the high CEO pay and a CEO-to-median-employee pay ratio (reported ~37:1) and the fact that the investment spending metric could create incentives to pursue transactions, although the company describes multi-level underwriting and approval processes to mitigate such risks. The vote is advisory only — it does not bind the Board — but the Board and Compensation Committee state they will consider voting outcomes and investor feedback when setting future compensation policies and awards. Overall, the proposal asks shareholders to endorse management’s pay-for-performance framework that ties significant compensation to multi-year, relative and absolute financial metrics aimed at promoting long-term shareholder value, while acknowledging the non-binding nature of the vote and areas where shareholders may scrutinize pay levels and metric design.
- 3
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
ManagementBoard: FORRatify the Audit Committee’s appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.
Nominees on the ballot10
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 8.6% | 6,591,378 | $329M |
| 2 | BlackRock, Inc. | 6.0% | 4,552,320 | $227M |
| 3 | STATE STREET CORP | 5.0% | 3,844,656 | $193M |
| 4 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 4.3% | 3,285,956 | $164M |
| 5 | BlackRock, Inc. | 4.1% | 3,156,362 | $158M |
| 6 | Quantinno Capital Management LP | 2.1% | 1,572,738 | $79M |
| 7 | LSV ASSET MANAGEMENT | 1.9% | 1,452,758 | $73M |
| 8 | AQR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 1.9% | 1,447,920 | $72M |
| 9 | CHARLES SCHWAB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC | 1.8% | 1,372,135 | $69M |
| 10 | GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC | 1.8% | 1,348,948 | $67M |
Other Real Estate sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Epr Properties’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Epr Properties 2026 annual meeting?
- Epr Properties (EPR) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Tuesday, May 5, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Epr Properties 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Epr Properties 2026 meeting is Monday, March 9, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Epr Properties's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 10 director nominees at the Epr Properties 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Epr Properties 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Epr Properties 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.