Dexcom Inc
12 nominees · 3 ballot items.
Elect twelve directors to the Board; ratify Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2026; and approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers for fiscal 2025 (Say-on-Pay).
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Dexcom Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot3
- 1
Election of Directors
ManagementBoard: FORElect twelve nominees to DexCom’s Board of Directors, each to hold office until the 2027 annual meeting of stockholders.
- 2
Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
ManagementBoard: FORRatify the Audit Committee’s selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.
- 3
Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation (Say-on-Pay
ManagementBoard: FORNon-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of the company’s named executive officers for fiscal year 2025 as disclosed in the proxy statement.
More detail
This management proposal asks stockholders to cast a non-binding advisory vote approving the company’s fiscal 2025 named executive officer (NEO) compensation as disclosed in the proxy (the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables, and accompanying narrative). Management is seeking shareholder approval to confirm that its pay-for-performance approach, which emphasizes a majority of at-risk compensation (annual cash incentives and long-term equity awards including PSUs tied to adjusted revenue and three-year relative TSR), is aligned with stockholder interests and supported management’s strategic objectives in 2025. The proxy frames the compensation program as having supported substantial revenue growth, improved operating margins, and strengthened customer metrics in 2025, and the Board cites those results in recommending a FOR vote. Governance context: the vote is advisory (non-binding) under Section 14A, and the company commits to consider the outcome in future compensation decisions; the Compensation Committee also uses independent consultants and peer benchmarking in setting pay. Key design elements relevant to evaluation include: PSUs tied 50% to CEO and 30% to other NEOs that combine one-year adjusted revenue targets with a three-year relative TSR overlay, an annual bonus plan with adjusted revenue and non-GAAP operating margin components, supplemental retention RSUs granted in 2025, and clawback and stock-ownership policies intended to align interests with long-term shareholders. Management’s counterpoint to potential criticisms (e.g., overlap between annual and long-term metrics, or the size of equity awards) is that revenue growth and profitability targets were deliberately rigorous, that a significant portion of pay is performance-based and subject to multi-year vesting and certification, and that the Compensation Committee exercised discretion and governance controls in structuring awards. For an analyst evaluating the proposal, important considerations include the degree of overlap between annual and long-term metrics, the calibration of thresholds/targets (which the filing discloses), the balance between retention and performance incentives (e.g., supplemental RSUs), and the company’s responsiveness to prior say-on-pay feedback (the filing notes ~90% prior support). The Board’s recommendation is premised on its assessment that the programs incentivize leadership to capture market opportunity, improve margins, and create durable shareholder value, while maintaining governance safeguards such as an independent compensation consultant, clawback policy, and stock ownership guidelines.
Nominees on the ballot12
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 6.5% | 25,020,961 | $1.6B |
| 2 | VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 5.0% | 19,219,953 | $1.2B |
| 3 | STATE STREET CORP | 4.6% | 17,934,847 | $1.1B |
| 4 | BlackRock, Inc. | 4.2% | 16,070,103 | $1.0B |
| 5 | Invesco Ltd. | 3.4% | 13,008,746 | $817M |
| 6 | ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN L.P. | 3.3% | 12,923,644 | $858M |
| 7 | GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC | 2.9% | 11,144,083 | $697M |
| 8 | WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT GROUP LLP | 2.3% | 8,808,950 | $553M |
| 9 | BAILLIE GIFFORD CO | 2.2% | 8,374,073 | $526M |
| 10 | BlackRock, Inc. | 2.1% | 7,977,830 | $501M |
Other Healthcare sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Dexcom Inc’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Dexcom Inc 2026 annual meeting?
- Dexcom Inc (DXCM) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Wednesday, May 27, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Dexcom Inc 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Dexcom Inc 2026 meeting is Wednesday, April 1, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Dexcom Inc's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 12 director nominees at the Dexcom Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Dexcom Inc 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Dexcom Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.