Duos Technologies Group Inc
5 nominees · 3 ballot items.
Elect five directors to one-year terms; ratify Salberg & Company, P.A. as independent auditors for fiscal 2026; and authorize adjournment of the Annual Meeting to solicit additional proxies if needed.
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Duos Technologies Group Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot3
- 1
Election of Directors
ManagementBoard: FORElect five directors (Charles P. Ferry, Ned Mavrommatis, James Craig Nixon, Frank A. Lonegro, and Brian J. James) to hold office for one-year terms and until their successors are elected and qualified.
- 2
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
ManagementBoard: FORRatify the appointment of Salberg & Company, P.A. as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.
- 3
Adjournment of the Annual Meeting if Necessary to Permit Further Solicitation of Proxies
ManagementBoard: FORAuthorize the Board to adjourn or postpone the Annual Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve one or more proposals at the time of the meeting.
More detail
This proposal asks shareholders to grant the Board authority to adjourn or postpone the Annual Meeting if there are not sufficient votes to approve one or more proposals, so that the Company may solicit additional proxies. Management seeks this approval as a procedural safeguard to allow time to continue outreach and solicitation efforts where vote shortfalls exist, thereby increasing the likelihood that key matters (director elections, auditor ratification) will be approved without having to reconvene under less favorable circumstances. The practical effect, if approved, is to give the Board discretion to select new dates for the meeting or to delay the start of the meeting to permit further solicitation, which is a common corporate governance mechanism to address unexpected voting outcomes. The proposal specifies that shareholders who have already submitted proxies do not need to re-submit them unless they wish to change instructions, and it notes the Company does not intend to use the adjournment authority if the other proposals are already approved. Approval requires a simple majority of votes cast and abstentions and broker non-votes will not affect the result. The Board’s recommendation to vote FOR is grounded in the view that adjournment authority protects shareholder and company interests by avoiding premature termination of the meeting and facilitating adequate shareholder participation in contested outcomes. However, such adjournment power can be used strategically to extend solicitation periods, which may permit management to gather additional support through targeted outreach or additional solicitations of affiliated holders; shareholders should weigh the benefit of ensuring a quorum and adequate consideration against the potential for delay. Given the Company’s capital structure (including preferred shares with enhanced voting rights held by related entities) and recent governance changes, the adjournment authority could be material in close votes and may influence the timing and dynamics of any contested matters. Overall, the proposal is procedural in nature and typically considered pro-management, but its exercise could have substantive implications in closely contested votes.
Nominees on the ballot5
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alyeska Investment Group, L.P. | 6.5% | 1,906,659 | $13M |
| 2 | Bleichroeder LP | 5.6% | 1,627,806 | $11M |
| 3 | ROYAL BANK OF CANADA | 4.5% | 1,329,691 | $9M |
| 4 | Northern Right Capital Management, L.P.Activist | 3.7% | 1,077,626 | $7M |
| 5 | MORGAN STANLEY | 3.6% | 1,045,852 | $7M |
| 6 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 3.3% | 971,826 | $7M |
| 7 | Covalis Capital LLP | 2.4% | 696,999 | $5M |
| 8 | Shay Capital LLC | 2.3% | 661,100 | $5M |
| 9 | GRATIA CAPITAL, LLC | 1.5% | 442,932 | $3M |
| 10 | Regal Partners Ltd | 1.5% | 439,680 | $3M |
Other Technology sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Duos Technologies Group Inc’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Duos Technologies Group Inc 2026 annual meeting?
- Duos Technologies Group Inc (DUOT) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Thursday, May 28, 2026.
- Who are the director nominees for Duos Technologies Group Inc's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 5 director nominees at the Duos Technologies Group Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Duos Technologies Group Inc 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Duos Technologies Group Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.