2 nominees · 5 ballot items.
Elect two Class II directors; approve an increase of 1,800,000 shares to the Delcath 2020 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan; ratify CBIZ CPAs P.C. as the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2026; approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of named executive officers (Say-on-Pay); and transact any other business properly brought before the meeting.
Elect Elizabeth Czerepak and John R. Sylvester as Class II directors to hold office until the 2029 annual meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.
Approve an amendment to the 2020 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares available for issuance under the plan by 1,800,000 shares (from 9,325,000 to 11,125,000, if approved).
This management proposal requests shareholder approval to increase the 2020 Plan share reserve by 1,800,000 shares to sustain the company’s equity compensation program. Management frames the request as necessary to attract, motivate and retain employees, non‑employee directors and consultants as Delcath scales commercial and clinical activities; the Board cites an analysis from compensation consultant FW Cook addressing burn rate, overhang and competitive market practices as supporting evidence for the size of the increase. The filing discloses that as of March 16, 2026 only 752,179 shares remained available under the plan and that the proposed increase is expected to provide sufficient shares for approximately the next year under management’s hiring and grant assumptions. The Board quantifies expected dilution metrics — describing the requested reserve as less than 5% of common share equivalents with pre-funded warrants and convertible preferreds included — and projects a roughly 5% burn rate if awards are granted as options and RSUs. Key governance safeguards include individual award limits, director grant value limits, a prohibition on repricing without stockholder approval, and clawback/recoupment language; the plan also preserves the Board’s discretion on vesting, adjustments for corporate events, and share-counting rules including treatment of substitute awards. From a shareholder perspective the principal tradeoff is dilution versus retention and incentive alignment: the company argues equity awards are critical to link employee incentives to long‑term shareholder value, while investors will weigh near-term dilution, historic grant levels, and actual realized pay versus performance. Given the Board’s reliance on an independent compensation consultant, explicit caps on per‑participant grants, and disclosure of historical usage, the proposal presents as a routine but material capital allocation decision: approval maintains management flexibility to grant long‑term incentives but also commits shareholders to a non‑trivial increase in share issuance authority that should be monitored through future disclosure, burn-rate metrics and grant practices.
Ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of CBIZ CPAs P.C. as Delcath’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.
Approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of Delcath’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement (‘‘Say-on-Pay’’).
This is the company’s non‑binding advisory ‘‘say‑on‑pay’’ proposal seeking shareholder approval of the overall compensation program for named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy. The proposal asks shareholders to endorse a compensation mix that consists of base salary, annual cash incentives under an Annual Incentive Plan tied to corporate and (for some NEOs) individual objectives, and long‑term equity awards (stock options and restricted stock units) intended to align management incentives with long‑term shareholder value. Management emphasizes pay‑for‑performance design elements, use of an independent compensation consultant (FW Cook), caps on individual grants and clawback/recoupment policies to mitigate excess risk‑taking and align outcomes with company performance. The vote is advisory only, not binding, but the Board and Compensation Committee state they will consider the results when setting future pay; thus a strong shareholder negative vote could trigger compensation program review or changes. Investors typically evaluate such proposals on the link between realized pay and company performance, disclosure quality, equity dilution from grants, and governance controls; the proxy includes pay versus performance tables and detailed narrative to facilitate that assessment. Given the company’s described use of an independent consultant, explicit limits on awards, disclosed AIP metrics and recoupment policy, management argues the program is appropriately designed to balance retention and performance incentives; however shareholders will consider historical pay outcomes, the scale of recent equity grants, and whether incentive metrics constrained management appropriately. The Board’s recommendation for a FOR vote frames this as a governance engagement tool: approval signals shareholder support for the current compensation framework, whereas a negative vote would likely prompt more direct engagement and potential program adjustments by the Compensation Committee.
Transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof; proxies have discretionary authority to vote on such matters.
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rosalind Advisors, Inc. | 9.6% | 3,300,389 | $31M |
| 2 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 3.9% | 1,329,288 | $12M |
| 3 | BlackRock, Inc. | 3.1% | 1,085,131 | $10M |
| 4 | Propel Bio Management, LLC | 2.8% | 979,698 | $9M |
| 5 | STATE STREET CORP | 1.9% | 664,428 | $6M |
| 6 | GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC | 1.7% | 592,266 | $5M |
| 7 | Private Wealth Advisors, LLC | 1.7% | 591,524 | $5M |
| 8 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC | 1.7% | 588,055 | $5M |
| 9 | Divisadero Street Capital Management, LP | 1.4% | 499,796 | $5M |
| 10 | BlackRock, Inc. | 1.4% | 491,192 | $5M |
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.