Boardroom Alpha
Meeting calendar
DAN · Annual meeting · Wednesday, April 22, 2026

Dana Inc

8 nominees · 4 ballot items.

Elect eight directors; advisory (non-binding) vote to approve executive compensation (say-on-pay); ratify PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent auditors; and vote on a shareholder proposal to require an independent Board Chairman (separate Chair and CEO).

Market cap
$2.9B
1Y TSR
+66.0%
Board grade
B-
Record date
Feb 23, 2026
Filing
DEF 14A
Meeting concluded · Apr 22, 2026

Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Dana Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.

Proposals

On the ballot4

  1. 1

    Election of Directors

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Elect eight (8) directors to serve one-year terms until the 2027 annual meeting or until their successors are elected and qualified; nominees are Byron S. Foster, Ernesto M. Hernández, Bridget E. Karlin, Nora E. LaFreniere, Michael J. Mack, Jr., R. Bruce McDonald, H. Olivia Nelligan and Diarmuid B. O’Connell.

  2. 2

    Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of Dana’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement (Compensation Discussion & Analysis, compensation tables and narrative).

    More detail

    This management proposal asks shareholders to cast an advisory (non-binding) vote approving the Company’s fiscal 2025 executive compensation disclosures and overall compensation approach for the named executive officers. Management seeks this shareholder endorsement to validate its pay-for-performance framework, which emphasizes a mix of annual cash incentives tied to financial metrics and long-term equity incentives tied to multi-year performance (PSUs and RSUs). The Compensation Committee argues the program aligns executive incentives with strategic priorities including margin expansion, cash flow, and long-term return metrics (PRE-Tax ROIC, Free Cash Flow, Relative TSR) and that changes for 2026 reflect investor feedback. A favorable vote provides the Board and Compensation Committee with political cover to continue the current strategy and informs iterative plan design; a negative vote would prompt further shareholder engagement and potential plan adjustments. The Board recommends a vote FOR, citing the program’s demonstrated link between pay and recent company performance and execution of strategic transactions (e.g., Off-Highway divestiture) that returned capital to shareholders and reduced leverage. The proposal is advisory and non-binding, but the Board has committed to consider the vote results in future compensation decisions. Key governance context includes enhancements to stock ownership guidelines, clawback policies, and move to double-trigger change-in-control vesting for 2025 awards, which management highlights as shareholder-friendly practices. Given the program’s mix of short- and long-term metrics and the Board’s stated willingness to respond to shareholder feedback, a FOR vote signals support for management’s current approach while preserving the Board’s discretion to refine plan details.

  3. 3

    Ratification of the Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) as Dana’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.

  4. 4

    Shareholder Proposal to Require an Independent Board Chairman

    Shareholder — John Chevedden (2215 Nelson Ave., No. 205, Redondo Beach, California 90278Board: AGAINST

    Shareholder proposal requesting the Board adopt a policy (and amend governing documents as necessary) to separate the roles of Chairman and CEO and require the Chairman be an independent director.

    More detail

    The shareholder proposal requests that the Board adopt a binding policy to separate the roles of Chairman and CEO and require the Chairman to be an independent director, arguing that an independent chair would strengthen oversight, mitigate conflicts of interest, and better protect shareholder interests given recent operational and financial headwinds. The proponent emphasizes specific company performance concerns (stagnant share price over many years, plant closures and layoffs, year-over-year sales softness, negative adjusted free cash flow in Q2 2025) to support the case that stronger, independent oversight is needed. Management opposes the proposal, arguing that a fixed rule would constrain Board flexibility during an active corporate transformation and that the Company already has robust governance mechanisms, including a strengthened Lead Independent Director role and fully independent committees overseeing audit, compensation, and nominating matters. The Board notes that it will separate the Chairman and CEO roles effective July 1, 2026, and that prior similar proposals failed to achieve majority support, which management cites as evidence that a binding policy is unnecessary. From an analytical perspective, the proposal raises governance and accountability trade-offs: proponents prefer a formal structural check on management, while the Board prioritizes flexibility to match leadership structure to strategic circumstances. Key contextual considerations include the Company’s ongoing transformation (divestiture of Off-Highway business), recent operational challenges and restructuring, and the fact that the Board already has an enhanced Lead Independent Director role and is moving to separate the roles imminently; these factors may reduce the marginal benefit of a binding policy. For investors evaluating the merit of the proposal, the central question is whether a permanently mandated independent chair materially improves oversight beyond current mechanisms and the upcoming change to separate roles, weighed against the loss of Board flexibility to choose the most effective leadership arrangement during transitions.

Director elections

Nominees on the ballot8

Not independent
Tenure on this board
0.1 yrs
Also a director at
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp (WAB)
Independent
Tenure on this board
4.5 yrs
Also a director at
Constellation Brands Inc (STZ)
Independent
Tenure on this board
6.6 yrs
Also a director at
Lyondellbasell Industries NV (LYB)Lumexa Imaging Holdings Inc (LMRI)
Ownership

Top institutional holders10

Latest 13F quarter
1BlackRock, Inc.11.1%11,974,203$403M
2DIMENSIONAL FUND ADVISORS LP7.4%8,004,162$269M
3VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC7.3%7,898,892$266M
4AMERICAN CENTURY COMPANIES INC5.7%6,152,373$207M
5VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC4.8%5,205,851$175M
6STATE STREET CORP4.5%4,870,439$164M
7BlackRock, Inc.3.3%3,614,215$122M
8GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC2.5%2,683,513$90M
9MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC2.0%2,139,094$72M
10JACOBS LEVY EQUITY MANAGEMENT, INC1.9%2,076,218$70M
Filings

Recent key filings

Periodic reports
Definitive proxies
Reference

Frequently asked questions

When is the Dana Inc 2026 annual meeting?
Dana Inc (DAN) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Wednesday, April 22, 2026.
What is the record date for the Dana Inc 2026 meeting?
The record date for the Dana Inc 2026 meeting is Monday, February 23, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
Who are the director nominees for Dana Inc's 2026 meeting?
The board is presenting 8 director nominees at the Dana Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Dana Inc 2026 meeting?
Shareholders will vote on 4 proposals at the Dana Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
Disclaimer

The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.

This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.

None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.

No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.

Full disclaimer