Boardroom Alpha
Meeting calendar
CZR · Special meeting · Tuesday, September 22, 2026

Caesars Entertainment Inc

10 nominees · 3 ballot items.

Stockholders will vote on adopting the Fertitta Gaming Holdco merger agreement, approving related named-executive-officer compensation on a non-binding advisory basis, and authorizing adjournment to solicit additional proxies.

Market cap
$6.0B
1Y TSR
+13.8%
Board grade
B-
Record date
Aug 21, 2026
Filing
DEFM14A
Meeting concluded · Sep 22, 2026

Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Caesars Entertainment Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.

Proposals

On the ballot3

  1. 1

    Merger Proposal

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Approve and adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger under which Empire Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of Fertitta Gaming Holdco, LLC, will merge with and into Caesars Entertainment, Inc., with Caesars surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Fertitta Gaming Holdco, LLC; eligible shares will receive $31.00 in cash per share, plus a potential ticking fee if closing occurs after June 26, 2027.

    More detail

    The proposal asks stockholders to adopt the merger agreement and approve the acquisition of Caesars by Fertitta Gaming Holdco, LLC. The transaction would merge Empire Merger Sub into Caesars, leaving Caesars as a wholly owned subsidiary of Fertitta Gaming Holdco. Eligible holders would receive $31.00 per share in cash, subject to applicable withholding and exclusions, with a potential daily ticking fee if closing has not occurred by the specified date. Approval requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote, making abstentions and failures to vote functionally equivalent to opposition. Stockholder approval is a closing condition, so rejection would prevent the merger from being completed under the agreement. The Board emphasizes the substantial premium to the unaffected trading price, the certainty and liquidity of all-cash consideration, and the avoidance of certain refinancing and change-of-control costs through the transaction structure. The Board also considered standalone business risks, substantial indebtedness, competitive and macroeconomic pressures, regulatory issues, and execution uncertainty. PJT Partners rendered a fairness opinion that the merger consideration was fair from a financial point of view, and the Board concluded that the negotiated terms and financing arrangements provided a compelling outcome. The Board therefore recommends that stockholders vote FOR Proposal 1.

  2. 2

    Advisory Merger-Related Compensation Proposal

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to Caesars’ named executive officers in connection with the merger, including disclosed cash severance, equity-award cash-outs, and benefits.

    More detail

    The proposal asks stockholders to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, compensation that may be paid or become payable to Caesars’ named executive officers because of the merger. The disclosed arrangements include cash severance, cash payments for canceled equity awards, and health-benefit-related payments. Equity awards would generally be canceled and converted into cash based on the merger consideration, while severance benefits would generally require a qualifying termination after the change in control. The proposal is required under the Dodd-Frank Act and Exchange Act Rule 14a-21(c) as a say-on-golden-parachute vote. The proxy discloses estimated aggregate golden-parachute amounts for the named executive officers, while emphasizing that actual amounts may differ based on timing, performance, employment status, and other assumptions. The Board was aware that directors and executive officers had interests that could differ from those of ordinary stockholders and considered those interests when approving the merger. Approval requires a majority of votes cast by stockholders present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote. Abstentions and failures to vote have no effect on the outcome, assuming a quorum is present. The advisory vote is separate from the merger vote and is not a condition to closing. Contractually required compensation may be paid even if stockholders reject this proposal, so the vote provides an advisory expression rather than a veto. The Board recommends voting FOR Proposal 2.

  3. 3

    Adjournment Proposal

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Approve any adjournment of the special meeting to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to approve the Merger Proposal.

    More detail

    The proposal asks stockholders to authorize adjournment of the special meeting if additional time is needed to solicit proxies supporting the merger proposal. It is designed to address an insufficient vote total or potentially an insufficient quorum at the scheduled meeting. Approval requires a majority of the votes cast, rather than a majority of all outstanding shares. Abstentions and failures to vote have no effect on the proposal’s outcome, assuming a quorum is otherwise present. The Company does not intend to call a vote on this proposal if the Merger Proposal is already approved at the meeting. The Board and meeting chair also retain certain authority under the bylaws and merger agreement to postpone or adjourn the meeting in specified circumstances. The merger agreement limits the number and duration of adjournments that may be taken for proxy-solicitation or quorum purposes without Parent’s consent. The proposal does not itself approve the merger and is not a condition to closing. Its practical purpose is to preserve the Board’s ability to continue soliciting votes if the initial meeting does not produce the required approval. The Board recommends voting FOR Proposal 3 because additional solicitation may be necessary to obtain the majority approval required for the Merger Proposal.

Director elections

Nominees on the ballot10

Independent
Tenure on this board
9.4 yrs
Also a director at
Marinemax Inc (HZO)
Independent
Tenure on this board
2.4 yrs
Also a director at
Trueblue Inc (TBI)United Rentals Inc (URI)
Not independent
Tenure on this board
1.5 yrs
Not independent
Tenure on this board
1.5 yrs
Also a director at
Icahn Enterprises LP (IEP)
Ownership

Top institutional holders10

Latest 13F quarter
1BlackRock, Inc.8.2%16,646,893$502M
2Pentwater Capital Management LPActivist5.6%11,465,000$346M
3VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC5.1%10,304,031$311M
4VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC4.4%8,874,288$268M
5SG Americas Securities, LLC3.7%7,634,299$230M
6MORGAN STANLEY3.6%7,404,509$223M
7STATE STREET CORP3.3%6,684,986$202M
8BALYASNY ASSET MANAGEMENT L.P.2.9%5,979,100$180M
9Kite Lake Capital Management (UK) LLP2.7%5,510,000$166M
10BlackRock, Inc.2.7%5,503,045$166M
Filings

Recent key filings

Periodic reports
Definitive proxies
Reference

Frequently asked questions

When is the Caesars Entertainment Inc 2026 special meeting?
Caesars Entertainment Inc (CZR) holds its 2026 special shareholder meeting on Tuesday, September 22, 2026.
What is the record date for the Caesars Entertainment Inc 2026 meeting?
The record date for the Caesars Entertainment Inc 2026 meeting is Friday, August 21, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
Who are the director nominees for Caesars Entertainment Inc's 2026 meeting?
The board is presenting 10 director nominees at the Caesars Entertainment Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Caesars Entertainment Inc 2026 meeting?
Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Caesars Entertainment Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
Disclaimer

The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.

This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.

None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.

No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.

Full disclaimer