Columbus Circle Capital Corp II

1. 1

   Name Change Proposal

   ManagementBoard: FOR

   Approve, as special resolution, a change of the Company’s name from “Columbus Circle Capital Corp II” to “Inflection Point Acquisition Corp. VII” and adopt amended and restated Memorandum and Articles of Association in the form set forth in Annex A to reflect the name change.

   More detail

   The Name Change Proposal asks shareholders to approve a special resolution to change the company’s legal name to Inflection Point Acquisition Corp. VII and to adopt amended and restated constitutional documents to reflect that new name. Management is seeking shareholder approval because changing the registered name and updating the Memorandum and Articles of Association are corporate acts that require a special resolution under the Cayman Companies Act, and cannot be effected without shareholders’ affirmative vote. The filing explicitly ties the proposed change to recent leadership and sponsor alignment — effective June 26, 2026 the company appointed Michael Blitzer and Kevin Shannon (affiliated with Inflection Point Asset Management LLC) to senior roles — and management frames the name change as part of the partnership with Inflection Point Asset Management LLC and the company’s evolving post-IPO identity. The Board unanimously recommends FOR the proposal, arguing the change is in the best interests of the company and its shareholders and is a necessary step ahead of continuing to pursue the Proposed Business Combination. Key legal and procedural context: the approval requires a Cayman special resolution (at least a two‑thirds majority of votes cast by holders of Class A and Class B ordinary shares voting together), no exchange of share certificates is required, and the company must file the amended constitutional documents with the Cayman registrar if approved. From a governance and investor perspective, the vote is largely cosmetic but signals a formal management/sponsor transition and potential rebranding ahead of or in connection with the Proposed Business Combination; sponsor holdings (approx. 25.3% of outstanding ordinary shares) are committed to vote in favor, increasing the likelihood of passage if a quorum is present. Shareholders should note this vote is separate from and does not substitute for any future vote on the Proposed Business Combination, and there are no appraisal or dissenters’ rights under Cayman law for this corporate name change. Overall, while operational impact is limited, the proposal is strategically relevant because it formalizes the company’s alignment with Inflection Point and clears a legal prerequisite for the company’s post-combination identity.

2. 2

   Adjournment Proposal

   ManagementBoard: FOR

   Approve, as an ordinary resolution, authorizing the chairman to adjourn the Extraordinary General Meeting to a later date or dates, or indefinitely, to permit further solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve the Name Change Proposal or if the Board determines additional time is necessary to effectuate the Name Change.

   More detail

   The Adjournment Proposal seeks shareholder authorization, by ordinary resolution, to permit the chairman to adjourn the Extraordinary General Meeting to one or more later dates (or indefinitely) to allow further solicitation of proxies if, based on votes tabulated during the meeting, there are insufficient votes to approve the Name Change Proposal or if the Board otherwise determines additional time is necessary to effectuate the Name Change. Management is proposing this as a contingency mechanism to preserve the ability to continue soliciting votes without having the meeting conclude with an unresolved Name Change vote; adjournment authority is customary in contested or close-vote situations and is procedural rather than substantive. The Board unanimously recommends FOR the Adjournment Proposal because, if the adjournment authority is not approved and the Name Change lacks sufficient votes at the meeting, the chairman may be unable to lawfully adjourn the meeting to seek additional support and the Name Change would fail. The approval standard for this item is a simple majority of votes cast, which is materially lower than the two-thirds threshold required for the Name Change itself, so passage is likely given the Board and Sponsor support. From a shareholder governance perspective, the Adjournment Proposal grants the Board tactical flexibility but does not itself effect the Name Change nor alter shareholder rights; it simply permits additional time to solicit support for a separate substantive proposal. Potential concerns for shareholders include the prospect of repeated adjournments that prolong uncertainty, but management frames the proposal as a limited and routine procedural safeguard. In context, because the Sponsor holds a substantial stake and has committed to vote in favor, the adjournment authority primarily protects the company’s ability to secure the necessary supermajority for the Name Change if initial vote totals are close or if additional outreach is warranted.

Upcoming shareholder meetings at Columbus Circle Capital Corp II’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.

When is the Columbus Circle Capital Corp II 2026 special meeting?

Columbus Circle Capital Corp II (CMII) holds its 2026 special shareholder meeting on Wednesday, August 26, 2026.

What is the record date for the Columbus Circle Capital Corp II 2026 meeting?

The record date for the Columbus Circle Capital Corp II 2026 meeting is Thursday, July 16, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.

Who are the director nominees for Columbus Circle Capital Corp II's 2026 meeting?

The board is presenting 8 director nominees at the Columbus Circle Capital Corp II 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.

What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Columbus Circle Capital Corp II 2026 meeting?

Shareholders will vote on 2 proposals at the Columbus Circle Capital Corp II 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.