9 nominees · 4 ballot items.
Shareholders will vote to elect nine directors, ratify KPMG LLP as independent auditor for 2026, approve the Armstrong World Industries, Inc. 2026 Directors Stock Unit Plan (a new director equity plan), and provide an advisory (non-binding) approval of the company’s executive compensation (say-on-pay).
Elect nine nominees named in the proxy statement to serve as directors until the next annual meeting and qualification of successors.
Ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as Armstrong World Industries’ independent registered public accounting firm for 2026.
Approve the Armstrong World Industries, Inc. 2026 Directors Stock Unit Plan, a new equity compensation plan for nonemployee directors that would replace the 2016 plan and authorize up to 250,000 shares (with other plan features including an annual grant limit and administration by the Governance Committee).
This management proposal requests shareholder approval of the 2026 Directors Stock Unit Plan, a successor director equity compensation plan that would replace the 2016 Directors Stock Unit Plan and become effective July 1, 2026 if approved. Management seeks shareholder approval principally to satisfy NYSE listing requirements and to preserve the company’s ability to grant equity-based compensation to nonemployee directors, with a proposed reserve of 250,000 shares (approximately 0.58% of diluted shares outstanding). The plan is structured to continue the company’s director compensation program—combining equity and cash retainers—to attract, motivate and retain qualified nonemployee directors and to align directors’ financial interests with those of shareholders. The plan contains an aggregate cap, an individual annual grant value/limit tied to a $750,000 combined value limit (including director cash fees), vesting that generally occurs at the next annual meeting (or upon death, disability or change-in-control), and administration by the Board or the Governance Committee. Management explains the share determination logic and estimates the reserve would support awards for roughly a decade under current practices, but notes actual usage could vary. Other plan features include standard anti-dilution adjustments, dividend equivalents, deferral mechanics consistent with Section 409A, and clawback and holding requirements tied to governance policies. The Board’s favorable recommendation emphasizes governance oversight by the Governance Committee and the need to maintain continuity in director compensation practices consistent with market norms. Key risks for shareholders are dilution (though limited) and the discretion afforded to the Committee on grant sizes and adjustments; key benefits are continued director alignment with shareholder outcomes and meeting NYSE requirements that would otherwise restrict equity grants. Given the limited dilution and the role of equity in aligning nonemployee directors with shareholders, the Board recommends a FOR vote, and the Governance Committee remains the delegated administrator to oversee grant terms and adherence to applicable governance and tax rules.
Non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of the company's named executive officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and accompanying compensation tables.
This management proposal requests a non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation paid to named executive officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and compensation tables. The vote does not change pay but serves as a gauge of shareholder support; the Board and Compensation Committee state they will review results and consider them in future decisions. Management argues the program aligns pay with performance by putting a substantial portion of pay “at risk,” using multiple metrics (Absolute TSR, adjusted FCF, Mineral Fiber Volume for PSUs; revenue and adjusted EBITDA for annual incentives), and combining time-based and performance-based equity to promote retention and long-term value creation. The Compensation Committee highlights governance features including independent committee oversight, third-party consultant advice, shareholder engagement historically, recoupment (clawback) provisions, stock ownership guidelines, and limits on maximum payouts. The company reports past shareholder engagement and cites an 84% prior say-on-pay approval as evidence of support, while noting the current program’s targeted market positioning and use of rigorous performance targets. Key considerations for investors are the program’s strong alignment to shareholder returns and cash flow, the meaningful upside and downside tied to achievement of challenging goals, and potential dilution and payout quantum when targets are met or exceeded. Because the proposal is advisory, critics may point to the non-binding nature and to discretion retained by the Compensation Committee over plan design and discretion in individual adjustments; proponents will value the disclosed mechanisms linking pay to multi-year performance. The Board recommends a FOR vote based on its assessment that the program drives long-term shareholder value and attracts and retains necessary executive talent.
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BlackRock, Inc. | 8.6% | 3,687,557 | $608M |
| 2 | VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 5.2% | 2,233,389 | $368M |
| 3 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 4.5% | 1,918,199 | $316M |
| 4 | LONDON CO OF VIRGINIA | 4.0% | 1,723,367 | $284M |
| 5 | STATE STREET CORP | 3.3% | 1,414,904 | $233M |
| 6 | BANK OF MONTREAL /CAN/ | 2.9% | 1,217,541 | $201M |
| 7 | BlackRock, Inc. | 2.7% | 1,132,178 | $187M |
| 8 | AQR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 2.6% | 1,104,350 | $177M |
| 9 | FULLER THALER ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. | 2.4% | 1,041,354 | $172M |
| 10 | Neuberger Berman Group LLC | 2.1% | 916,010 | $151M |
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.