Boardroom Alpha
Meeting calendar
ARW · Annual meeting · Tuesday, May 12, 2026

Arrow Electronics Inc

8 nominees · 6 ballot items.

Elect eight directors; ratify EY as auditor; advisory say-on-pay; amend Certificate to remove supermajority voting (4a & 4b); management proposal to allow shareholders to call special meetings at 25% threshold; shareholder proposal to allow special meetings at 10% threshold.

Market cap
$10.6B
1Y TSR
+63.7%
Board grade
B+
Record date
Mar 16, 2026
Filing
DEF 14A
Meeting concluded · May 12, 2026

Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Arrow Electronics Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.

Proposals

On the ballot6

  1. 1

    Election of Directors

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Elect eight directors named in the proxy statement to serve one-year terms expiring at the 2027 annual meeting.

  2. 2

    Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Ratify Ernst & Young LLP as Arrow’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.

    More detail

    This management proposal asks shareholders to ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of Ernst & Young LLP (EY) as Arrow’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2026. Management seeks shareholder ratification as a matter of good governance despite the Audit Committee’s authority to appoint auditors, aiming to reaffirm investor confidence in the firm’s qualifications, independence, and familiarity with Arrow’s operations. The Audit Committee evaluated EY’s audit quality, capability to handle Arrow’s global operations, communication quality, integrity, fee appropriateness, and tenure; it emphasized benefits of institutional knowledge and efficiencies from continued engagement. The Board and Audit Committee recommend a vote FOR, arguing that retaining EY avoids onboarding costs and potential disruption, supports audit quality through continuity, and aligns with oversight practices such as pre-approval of non-audit services by the Audit Committee.

  3. 3

    Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of Arrow’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement.

    More detail

    This management proposal asks shareholders to cast a non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of Arrow’s Named Executive Officers (NEOs) as disclosed in the CD&A and related compensation tables. Management frames the pay program as heavily performance-based—85% of NEO target total direct compensation is at risk in 2025—using a mix of Absolute EPS for annual incentives and multi-year PSUs tied to rEPS, ROIC-WACC, and for some roles rTSR to align pay with long-term shareholder returns. The Board recommends FOR, citing strong link between pay and performance, annual shareholder engagement, recent say-on-pay support, rigorous metrics and clawback and anti-hedging policies. The advisory vote provides feedback to the Compensation Committee though it is not binding.

  4. 4

    Amend Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Remove Supermajority Voting Provisions

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Approve amendments to the Restated Certificate to remove certain supermajority voting provisions and override New York default supermajority requirements.

    More detail

    This management proposal seeks shareholder approval to amend Arrow’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate specific supermajority voting provisions (including a 90% provision and default New York 66⅔% provisions) and make ministerial changes. Management says the action responds to a 2025 shareholder advisory that passed and that removing these barriers modernizes governance, aligns with peer practices, and reduces impediments to standard corporate actions. The Board recommends FOR, arguing the supermajority provisions are overly restrictive, narrow in scope, and that opting out of New York default supermajority rules will enhance shareholder democracy while protecting shareholder interests through other governance mechanisms.

  5. 5

    Arrow Proposal to Provide Shareholders with the Ability to Call a Special Shareholder Meeting at a 25% Ownership Threshold

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Advisory proposal asking shareholders to approve Board action to amend the By-laws to allow shareholders owning 25% collectively to call a special meeting.

    More detail

    This management-sponsored advisory proposal asks shareholders to approve a Board-initiated by-law amendment to permit shareholders who collectively own 25% or more of outstanding common stock to call special shareholder meetings. Management frames the 25% threshold as consistent with S&P 500 practice and as a balance between empowering shareholders to act on urgent matters while preventing smaller groups or activists from creating distraction and incurring significant costs. The Board recommends FOR because it considers the change an enhancement of shareholder rights calibrated to protect long-term interests and prevent misuse; the proposal is non-binding and the Board would take steps to amend the By-laws if approved.

  6. 6

    Shareholder Proposal to Provide Shareholders with the Ability to Call a Special Shareholder Meeting at a 10% Ownership Threshold

    Shareholder — John CheveddenBoard: AGAINST

    Shareholder-submitted proposal (John Chevedden) requesting Arrow amend governing documents to allow shareholders owning combined 10% to call a special shareholder meeting.

    More detail

    This shareholder proposal requests that Arrow amend its governing documents to allow shareholders holding a combined 10% of outstanding common stock to call special meetings, arguing this threshold aligns with other companies and empowers shareholders to address board complacency; the proponent asks for no ownership-duration requirement and allows online meetings. Management opposes, recommending the Board’s 25% threshold as a more appropriate balance to prevent disruption and misuse by small groups or single large shareholders, noting Arrow’s robust shareholder engagement. The central controversy is governance: whether to maximize shareholder access (10%) or to protect the company from potential activist disruption (25%). The proposal is non-binding if presented.

Director elections

Nominees on the ballot8

Independent
Tenure on this board
8.6 yrs
Also a director at
Fti Consulting Inc (FCN)
Independent
Tenure on this board
4.8 yrs
Also a director at
Emcor Group Inc (EME)
Independent
Tenure on this board
3.2 yrs
Also a director at
Zebra Technologies Corp (ZBRA)
Ownership

Top institutional holders10

Latest 13F quarter
1VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC6.3%3,198,502$459M
2ACR Alpine Capital Research, LLC6.1%3,129,483$449M
3BlackRock, Inc.5.6%2,855,281$409M
4DIMENSIONAL FUND ADVISORS LP5.6%2,842,662$408M
5VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC4.5%2,291,860$329M
6LSV ASSET MANAGEMENT3.8%1,922,005$276M
7GREENHAVEN ASSOCIATES INC3.7%1,895,860$272M
8AQR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC3.3%1,701,190$238M
9STATE STREET CORP3.3%1,686,365$242M
10Boston Partners3.1%1,567,268$225M
Filings

Recent key filings

Periodic reports
Definitive proxies
Reference

Frequently asked questions

When is the Arrow Electronics Inc 2026 annual meeting?
Arrow Electronics Inc (ARW) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Tuesday, May 12, 2026.
What is the record date for the Arrow Electronics Inc 2026 meeting?
The record date for the Arrow Electronics Inc 2026 meeting is Monday, March 16, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
Who are the director nominees for Arrow Electronics Inc's 2026 meeting?
The board is presenting 8 director nominees at the Arrow Electronics Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Arrow Electronics Inc 2026 meeting?
Shareholders will vote on 6 proposals at the Arrow Electronics Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
Disclaimer

The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.

This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.

None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.

No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.

Full disclaimer