Amplitude Inc
3 nominees · 3 ballot items.
Three management proposals: (1) elect three Class II directors (Pat Grady, Curtis Liu, Catherine Wong) to serve until 2029; (2) ratify KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year ending December 31, 2026; and (3) approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, plus miscellaneous other business.
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Amplitude Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot3
- 1
Election of Directors
ManagementBoard: FORElect Pat Grady, Curtis Liu, and Catherine Wong as Class II Directors to serve until the 2029 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until each such director’s respective successor is elected and qualified.
- 2
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
ManagementBoard: FORRatify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.
- 3
Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay
ManagementBoard: FORApprove, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement (CD&A, compensation tables, and related narrative).
More detail
This management proposal asks shareholders to cast a non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement (CD&A, compensation tables, and narrative). Management seeks this advisory approval to affirm its compensation philosophy and practices, which emphasize pay-for-performance, a mix of base salary, cash-based incentive awards tied to net new ARR and non-GAAP operating income, and equity-based incentives to align executives with long-term stockholder value. The proposal is required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act and is presented as an advisory measure, meaning the board and compensation committee are not legally bound but will consider the vote results when making future compensation decisions. The Board recommends "FOR," arguing that the program is competitive, uses measurable company performance metrics, engages independent compensation consultants, and includes governance features such as a clawback policy and limits on repricing. Company-specific context includes strong 2025 operational results (e.g., ARR growth, net new ARR above target) and high prior shareholder support (98.3% in 2025), which the Compensation Committee cites in maintaining the program design. Potential governance considerations for sophisticated investors include the advisory (non-binding) nature of the vote—meaning a negative outcome is a reputational signal rather than an immediate operational constraint—and the degree to which disclosed metrics and equity grant practices drive long-term alignment versus short-term incentives. The board’s response frames the vote as a way to solicit shareholder feedback while retaining discretion; investors should weigh the disclosed pay elements, performance targets, peer benchmarking, and the company’s historical vote outcomes when evaluating whether the compensation program appropriately balances retention, incentives, and shareholder alignment. Overall, a "FOR" vote supports management's view that the current mix of cash and equity incentives, performance metrics, consultant oversight, and governance safeguards provide appropriate incentives for executives to pursue sustainable growth and shareholder value creation.
Nominees on the ballot3
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT GROUP LLP | 5.3% | 6,977,459 | $48M |
| 2 | VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 4.6% | 6,165,091 | $42M |
| 3 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 3.1% | 4,091,320 | $28M |
| 4 | BlackRock, Inc. | 3.0% | 3,924,879 | $27M |
| 5 | BlackRock, Inc. | 2.9% | 3,805,608 | $26M |
| 6 | FMR LLC | 2.5% | 3,279,127 | $22M |
| 7 | SC US (TTGP), LTD. | 1.9% | 2,563,750 | $17M |
| 8 | STATE STREET CORP | 1.8% | 2,429,307 | $17M |
| 9 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P.Activist | 1.8% | 2,411,300 | $16M |
| 10 | WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT GROUP LLP | 1.7% | 2,206,092 | $15M |
Other Technology sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Amplitude Inc’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Amplitude Inc 2026 annual meeting?
- Amplitude Inc (AMPL) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Tuesday, June 9, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Amplitude Inc 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Amplitude Inc 2026 meeting is Wednesday, April 15, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Amplitude Inc's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 3 director nominees at the Amplitude Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Amplitude Inc 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Amplitude Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.