Boardroom Alpha
Meeting calendar
AMGN · Annual meeting · Tuesday, May 19, 2026

Amgen Inc

12 nominees · 4 ballot items.

Election of 12 directors; advisory approval of executive compensation (“Say on Pay”); ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors; and a stockholder proposal to require an independent Board chairman.

Market cap
$200.5B
1Y TSR
+23.2%
Board grade
B
Record date
Mar 20, 2026
Filing
DEF 14A
Meeting concluded · May 19, 2026

Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Amgen Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.

Proposals

On the ballot4

  1. 1

    Election of Directors

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Elect 12 nominees to Amgen’s Board for one-year terms.

  2. 2

    Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (“Say on Pay”

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation paid to Amgen’s Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the proxy statement.

    More detail

    This proposal asks shareholders to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation paid to Amgen’s Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the proxy. Management is seeking approval to confirm its approach to executive pay, which emphasizes long-term, performance-based equity awards (80% of grants are performance-based) and a mix of annual cash incentives tied to rigorous financial and operational goals. The company highlights strong 2025 financial performance, pipeline progress, and operational execution as justification for pay outcomes, and stresses governance safeguards—stock ownership guidelines, clawbacks, recoupment policies, independent compensation consultant, and majority voting—to mitigate risk and align pay with stockholder interests. A FOR vote supports management’s retained discretion to implement its compensation program; a negative vote would signal investor discontent and likely prompt increased engagement and possible program changes. The Board recommends FOR, citing alignment of pay with performance and stockholder value creation. Institutional investors and proxy advisory firms typically evaluate say-on-pay on program design, disclosure, and realized pay relative to performance; Amgen’s large performance weighting and clear KPI linkages are central to management’s defense. The advisory nature of the vote means the Board will consider but is not bound by the result; historically Amgen received strong say-on-pay support and uses outreach to refine compensation governance. In evaluating the proposal, investors should weigh the firm’s 2025 operational and financial achievements, long-term equity mix, recoupment mechanisms, and responsiveness to stockholder feedback against concerns about absolute award sizes and retention practices. Overall, the proposal is primarily a governance confirmation vote rather than a specific policy change, and its passage would affirm the Board’s current compensation framework.

  3. 3

    Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accountants

    ManagementBoard: FOR

    Ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of Ernst & Young LLP as Amgen’s independent registered public accountants for fiscal year 2026.

  4. 4

    Stockholder Proposal — Independent Board Chairman

    Shareholder — John CheveddenBoard: AGAINST

    Stockholder proposal requesting Amgen adopt a policy to separate the roles of Chairman and CEO and require the Chairman be an independent director.

    More detail

    The shareholder proposal, submitted by John Chevedden, asks Amgen to amend its governing documents to require the Board Chair be an independent director and to separate the roles of Chair and CEO, arguing that an independent chairman would provide impartial oversight, reduce conflicts of interest, increase transparency, and strengthen accountability—particularly in light of recent business challenges such as patent expirations, pricing pressure, impairment charges, product concerns, and elevated leverage. The proponent’s case emphasizes that a detached independent chair would better focus on shareholder interests and checks-and-balances. Management and the Board oppose the proposal, arguing that Amgen’s existing governance (an annually elected lead independent director with robust duties, independent majority of directors, independent committee leadership, annual leadership structure reviews, strong stockholder rights and engagement) provides effective oversight while retaining flexibility to choose the most effective leadership structure. The Board contends mandatory separation would remove discretion to tailor leadership to company needs and could weaken governance; it cites Amgen’s strong 2025 operational and financial performance, significant R&D investments, and ongoing stockholder engagement as evidence the current structure is effective. For a sophisticated evaluation, key considerations include: the practical difference between a lead independent director with defined authorities versus an independent chair, the Board’s track record of exercising oversight during recent headwinds, the company’s responsiveness to stockholder feedback, and whether an independent chair would materially alter incentives or oversight effectiveness given Amgen’s committee structure and policies. Investors should assess empirical governance outcomes (frequency and content of executive sessions, lead director activities, committee independence and actions, CEO performance evaluation process) and consider whether formal separation would likely produce better monitoring or is largely symbolic at Amgen given its existing safeguards. The decision also interacts with succession planning: if separation would be phased or triggered by a CEO contract renewal or transition, the practical impact depends on transition timing and the Board’s criteria for selecting an independent chair. Ultimately, the vote represents a trade-off between prescriptive governance reform favored by some investors and the Board’s preference for flexible, context-dependent leadership arrangements supported by a strong lead independent director role.

Director elections

Nominees on the ballot12

Independent
Tenure on this board
9.5 yrs
Also a director at
Chevron Corp (CVX)Apple Inc (AAPL)
Not independent
Tenure on this board
15.5 yrs
Also a director at
Boeing Co (BA)
Independent
Tenure on this board
13.6 yrs
Also a director at
Levi Strauss & Co (LEVI)Uber Technologies Inc (UBER)
Independent
Tenure on this board
9.5 yrs
Also a director at
Phillips 66 (PSX)Carrier Global Corp (CARR)
Independent
Tenure on this board
14.5 yrs
Also a director at
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc (TMO)
Independent
Tenure on this board
9.8 yrs
Also a director at
Dell Technologies Inc (DELL)Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS)
Independent
Tenure on this board
6.0 yrs
Also a director at
Gap Inc (GAP)Carrier Global Corp (CARR)
Ownership

Top institutional holders10

Latest 13F quarter
1VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC6.5%35,014,232$12.3B
2STATE STREET CORP5.7%30,548,488$10.7B
3Capital World Investors5.4%29,288,343$10.3B
4BlackRock, Inc.3.3%17,761,735$6.2B
5Invesco Ltd.2.8%15,049,105$5.3B
6VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC2.7%14,621,148$5.1B
7GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC2.5%13,733,719$4.8B
8CHARLES SCHWAB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC2.4%12,773,386$4.5B
9BlackRock, Inc.2.1%11,230,082$4.0B
10PRIMECAP MANAGEMENT CO/CA/1.6%8,874,129$3.1B
Filings

Recent key filings

Periodic reports
Definitive proxies
Reference

Frequently asked questions

When is the Amgen Inc 2026 annual meeting?
Amgen Inc (AMGN) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Tuesday, May 19, 2026.
What is the record date for the Amgen Inc 2026 meeting?
The record date for the Amgen Inc 2026 meeting is Friday, March 20, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
Who are the director nominees for Amgen Inc's 2026 meeting?
The board is presenting 12 director nominees at the Amgen Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Amgen Inc 2026 meeting?
Shareholders will vote on 4 proposals at the Amgen Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
Disclaimer

The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.

This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.

None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.

No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.

Full disclaimer