Autodesk Inc
11 nominees · 5 ballot items.
Election of 11 directors; Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors; Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation (Say-on-Pay); Approval of an amendment to provide officer exculpation in the charter; Advisory vote on shareholder proposal to lower the special-meeting threshold to 10% (if properly presented).
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Autodesk Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot5
- 1
Election of Directors
ManagementBoard: FORElect 11 director nominees to serve until the next annual meeting.
- 2
Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
ManagementBoard: FORRatify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Autodesk’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year ending January 31, 2027.
- 3
Advisory Vote to Approve Compensation for Named Executive Officers (Say-on-Pay
ManagementBoard: FORNon-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of Autodesk’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement.
- 4
Approve Amendment to Provide Officer Exculpation
ManagementBoard: FORApprove an amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to add officer exculpation to the charter to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law.
More detail
The proposal requests stockholder approval to amend Autodesk’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to include officer exculpation to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL). Management is proposing this charter change to align the legal treatment of officers and directors, reduce potential frivolous litigation and related distraction and costs, and aid in recruiting and retaining executive talent by limiting personal monetary liability for officers for certain claims. The amendment is limited by the DGCL’s exceptions — it would not exculpate officers for breaches of the duty of loyalty, acts not in good faith, intentional misconduct, knowing violations of law, or transactions where the officer derived an improper personal benefit. The Board and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee recommend the amendment, arguing it remedies historical inconsistency in treatment between officers and directors, reduces potential litigation and insurance costs, and brings Autodesk in line with peer practices. The Board also notes the amendment is prospective and not motivated by any specific litigation. The company will file a Certificate of Amendment only if the proposal is approved by stockholders and the Board retains the right to abandon the amendment prior to filing. A majority of outstanding shares is required to adopt the amendment; abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.
- 5
Stockholder Proposal: Reduce Threshold to Call Special Stockholder Meetings to 10%
Shareholder — John CheveddenBoard: AGAINSTAdvisory shareholder proposal requesting that the Board amend governing documents to allow holders of 10% of outstanding common stock (or lowest under state law) to call a special meeting.
More detail
This shareholder proposal, submitted by John Chevedden, asks the Board to lower the stockholder-initiated special meeting threshold from 25% to 10% of outstanding common stock or the lowest permissible percentage under state law. The proponent argues a 10% threshold provides stockholders a reasonable ability to call time-sensitive meetings to address underperformance and that lower thresholds do not lead to abuses. Management strongly opposes the proposal, contending the current 25% threshold strikes the appropriate balance between providing a stockholder right and preventing misuse and unnecessary disruption; the Board notes the threshold was set in 2024 following stockholder approval and that many S&P 500 companies with special meeting rights have thresholds ≥25%. Management also emphasizes proactive stockholder engagement and other governance mechanisms that support accountability. The Board recommends voting against the proposal.
Nominees on the ballot11
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 6.5% | 13,780,084 | $3.3B |
| 2 | STATE STREET CORP | 4.7% | 9,983,551 | $2.4B |
| 3 | BlackRock, Inc. | 4.3% | 9,057,588 | $2.2B |
| 4 | VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 4.1% | 8,687,613 | $2.1B |
| 5 | Invesco Ltd. | 3.2% | 6,696,439 | $1.6B |
| 6 | GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC | 2.4% | 5,158,998 | $1.2B |
| 7 | LOOMIS SAYLES CO L P | 2.4% | 5,051,062 | $1.2B |
| 8 | BlackRock, Inc. | 2.2% | 4,593,981 | $1.1B |
| 9 | Ninety One UK Ltd | 1.9% | 4,025,659 | $964M |
| 10 | ARROWSTREET CAPITAL, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | 1.5% | 3,144,627 | $753M |
Other Technology sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Autodesk Inc’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Autodesk Inc 2026 annual meeting?
- Autodesk Inc (ADSK) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Wednesday, June 17, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Autodesk Inc 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Autodesk Inc 2026 meeting is Wednesday, April 22, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Autodesk Inc's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 11 director nominees at the Autodesk Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Autodesk Inc 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 5 proposals at the Autodesk Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.