Acv Auctions Inc
2 nominees · 3 ballot items.
Shareholders will vote to elect two Class II directors (Brian Hirsch and Eileen Kamerick), approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of the company’s named executive officers (say-on-pay), and ratify Ernst & Young LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2026.
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Acv Auctions Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot3
- 1
Election of the two Class II Directors named in this Proxy Statement
ManagementBoard: FORElect two Class II directors, Brian Hirsch and Eileen Kamerick, to serve three-year terms until the 2029 annual meeting.
- 2
Approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers
ManagementBoard: FORA non-binding advisory 'say-on-pay' resolution asking shareholders to approve the compensation of the company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement.
More detail
This proposal asks shareholders to cast a non-binding advisory vote to approve the total compensation paid to ACV’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement (the “say-on-pay” vote). Management seeks this advisory approval to validate its executive pay design, which emphasizes a mix of base salary, performance-based annual bonuses (gated by Adjusted EBITDA and GAAP revenue) and long-term equity incentives (RSUs and PSUs tied to multi-year service and performance metrics such as a relative TSR metric for 2025 PSUs). The Board frames this vote as a signal of shareholder support for its compensation philosophy—market-competitive pay, pay-for-performance, and alignment of executives’ interests with long-term shareholder value—while noting prior shareholder feedback (approximately 81% support in 2025) informed recent changes such as introducing rTSR-based PSUs and executive stock ownership guidelines. Because the vote is advisory, it will not bind the Board or Compensation Committee, but the company states it will consider the outcome when making future compensation decisions. Key context includes that the company did not pay annual bonuses for 2025 because both GAAP revenue and Adjusted EBITDA thresholds (gating payments) were not met, and the structure of PSUs was updated to emphasize rTSR performance against the Russell 2000 over a two-year period with capped payouts. Supporters of the proposal would argue the program better aligns pay with shareholder returns through equity-based, performance-contingent awards and places a heavier emphasis on long-term incentives. Critics might view certain elements—such as large equity grant values for NEOs or multi-year performance hurdles tied to stock price or peer-relative metrics—as potentially disconnecting pay from operating performance or enabling windfalls if metrics are met despite mixed operating results; they may also emphasize the non-binding nature of the vote as limiting direct governance change. The Board’s recommendation to vote FOR is grounded in its view that the compensation program incentivizes long-term value creation, mitigates risk through balanced pay mix and governance controls (independent compensation consultant, clawback policy, no hedging/pledging), and responds to shareholder engagement. Given the advisory character, investors should interpret the result as a directional indicator of shareholder sentiment on pay design and expect the Board to incorporate feedback into future plan design and disclosures.
- 3
Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm
ManagementBoard: FORRatify the Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.
Nominees on the ballot2
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Atreides Management, LP | 5.6% | 9,734,467 | $41M |
| 2 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 4.1% | 7,236,480 | $31M |
| 3 | WILLIAM BLAIR INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC | 4.1% | 7,212,623 | $31M |
| 4 | VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 4.1% | 7,173,655 | $30M |
| 5 | BlackRock, Inc. | 3.4% | 5,902,343 | $25M |
| 6 | D. E. Shaw Co., Inc.Activist | 3.2% | 5,564,046 | $24M |
| 7 | BlackRock, Inc. | 3.1% | 5,470,319 | $23M |
| 8 | IRIDIAN ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/CT | 3.0% | 5,200,509 | $22M |
| 9 | UBS Group AG | 2.5% | 4,444,364 | $19M |
| 10 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P.Activist | 2.4% | 4,177,143 | $18M |
Other Consumer Cyclical sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Acv Auctions Inc’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Acv Auctions Inc 2026 annual meeting?
- Acv Auctions Inc (ACVA) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Wednesday, May 27, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Acv Auctions Inc 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Acv Auctions Inc 2026 meeting is Wednesday, April 1, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Acv Auctions Inc's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 2 director nominees at the Acv Auctions Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Acv Auctions Inc 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Acv Auctions Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.