Column (d). The following Non-CEO named executive officers are included in the average figures shown:
2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025: Terrance Coyne, Christopher Hite, George Lloyd and Marshall Urist, M.D., Ph.D. Effective December 31, 2025, Mr. Lloyd transitioned from his role as Executive Vice President, Investments & Chief Legal Officer to Senior Advisor.
See “Profits of our Former External Manager” above for profits of our former external manager received by our Non-CEO NEOs in each year. The amounts shown in column (d) do not include profits of our former external manager of $1,782,183, $1,260,000, $1,200,000, $1,150,000 and $1,050,000 for 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Column (e). Average “compensation actually paid” for our Non-CEO NEOs reflects the amounts in column (d) of the table above, adjusted as set forth in the table below, as determined in accordance with SEC rules. See “Profits of our Former External Manager” above for profits of former external manager received by each of our Non-CEO NEOs. Amounts shown in column (e) do not include profits of our former external manager of $1,782,183, $1,260,000, $1,200,000, $1,150,000 and $1,050,000 for 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The dollar amounts reflected in column (e) of the table above do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to our Non-CEO NEOs during the applicable year. Further, the increase in the dollar amounts between columns (d) and (e) in the table above represents the year over year changes in the average salaries, bonuses, aggregate net present value (“NPV”) of Equity Performance Awards. For additional information regarding Equity Performance Awards, see “Equity Performance Awards” above.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| SCT Total Compensation | | | 3,839,063 | | | 4,350,000 | | | 4,560,000 | | | 1,260,000 | | | 1,323,000 | |
| Plus: Year-End NPV of Outstanding Equity Performance Awards Granted in the Covered Year | | | — | | | 1,878,336 | | | — | | | 5,976,000 | | | — | |
| Plus: Change in NPV of Outstanding Equity Performance Awards Granted in Prior Years | | | | | | — | | | 7,379,979 | | | 15,293,685 | | | 12,864,839 | |
| Plus: Change in NPV of Equity Performance Awards Granted in Prior Years which Became Payable in the Covered Year | | | 8,430,108 | | | 5,680,494 | | | (704,736) | | | 15,460,009 | | | 4,422,057 | |
| Less: Prior Year NPV of Equity Performance Awards Forfeited in the Covered Year | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Compensation Actually Paid | | | 12,269,171 | | | 11,908,830 | | | 11,235,243 | | | 37,989,694 | | | 18,609,896 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The same adjustment methodology and assumptions described above for the CEO apply to Non-CEO NEOs.
Column (f). Represents our cumulative total shareholder return (“TSR”) for the measurement periods beginning on the first trading day of 2021 and ending on December 31 of each respective year.
Column (g). Represents the cumulative TSR of our Biopharmaceutical and Capital Allocator Peer Groups as described above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for the measurement periods beginning on the first trading day of 2021 and ending on December 31 of each respective year. The peer group used in the prior year included our Biopharmaceutical Peer Group as well as Blackstone (BX), Apollo (APO), Jefferies (JEF), T. Rowe Price (TROW), Ares (ARES), Affiliated Managers Group (AMG), Carlyle (CG), Invesco (IVZ) and Lazard (LAZ) (which comprised our prior year Capital Allocator Peer Group) and the total TSR for 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025, based on the value of an initial fixed investment of $100 was $127.22, $140.50, $149.97, $166.01 and $202.81, respectively. The peer group change was made for the disclosure in this year’s proxy statement because we believe that the compensation peer group provides a more accurate benchmark for performance compared to the previously used peer group.
Column (h). Reflects “Consolidated Net Income” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
As the largest buyer of biopharmaceutical royalties and a leading funder of innovation across the biopharmaceutical industry, our revenue is comprised mostly of income from royalty assets. Consequently, we did not use net income as a performance measure because we classify most royalty assets that we acquire as financial assets that are measured at amortized cost using the prospective effective interest method which can be volatile and unpredictable. We do not believe the relationship between our net income and compensation actually paid to our NEOs during the periods presented is a key metric for our investors.
Column (i). Our Company-selected Measure is Portfolio Receipts Change which is described below.
Columns (j) and (k). We have also presented two additional financial measures—SG&A as % of Portfolio Receipts and Adjusted EBITDA Margin because they illustrate how compensation actually paid to our NEOs results in much lower SG&A versus our peers. Refer to the section “Appendix A— Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Measures” of this Proxy Statement for reconciliations of non-GAAP measures to their corresponding GAAP measure.