| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2025 | | | $245,047 | | | $(49,303) | | | — | | | $46,837 | | | — | | | — | | | $242,581 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5
| Company total shareholder return (TSR) is calculated by assuming that a $100 investment was made on the day prior to the first fiscal year reported and reinvesting all dividends until the last day of each reported fiscal year. |
6
| This column represents the amount of net income reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements for the applicable fiscal year. |
Description of the Information Presented in the Pay versus Performance Table
As described in greater detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and the executive compensation tables contained in this Proxy Statement, the Company’s executive compensation program reflects a pay-for-performance philosophy. While the Company utilizes several performance measures to align executive compensation with Company performance (as described in greater detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and the executive compensation tables contained in this Proxy Statement), not all of those Company measures are presented in the Pay versus Performance table. Moreover, the Company generally seeks to incentivize long-term performance, and therefore does not specifically align the Company’s performance measures with compensation that is actually paid (as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K) for a particular fiscal year. Compensation actually paid is influenced by numerous factors, including but not limited to the timing of new grant issuances and outstanding grant vesting, share price volatility during the fiscal year, our mix of short-term and long-term metrics, and many other factors. In accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the Company is providing the following descriptions of the relationships between information presented in the Pay versus Performance table.
Compensation Actually Paid and Cumulative Company TSR
The compensation actually paid to our PEO, as computed in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, was $1,834,449, $3,761,783, and $1,070,045 for fiscal years 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively. The average amount of compensation actually paid to the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Hull), as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, was $855,412, $1,238,630, and $598,100 for fiscal years 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively. The TSR of the Company, assuming an initial fixed $100 investment and computed in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, was $263.92, $297.50, and $135.42 for fiscal years 2025, 2024, and 2023 respectively. Please see Note 5 above for additional information related to the computation of Company TSR. Consequently, $100 invested in the Company immediately prior to the beginning of fiscal year 2023 increased by 163.92% to $263.92 by the end of fiscal year 2025. Over that same period, compensation actually paid to our PEO, and the average amount of compensation actually paid to the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Hull), also increased but with less magnitude.
Compensation Actually Paid and Company Net Income
The compensation actually paid to our PEO, as computed in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, was $1,834,449, $3,761,783, and $1,070,045 for fiscal years 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively. The average amount of compensation actually paid to the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Hull), as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, was $855,412, $1,238,630, and $598,100 for fiscal years 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively. The Company’s net income, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K and reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements for the applicable fiscal year, was $11,405,000, $18,753,000, and $738,000 for fiscal years 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively. Consequently, net income for fiscal year 2025 was over 1,400% higher than net income for fiscal year 2023. Over that same period, compensation actually paid to our PEO, and the average amount of compensation actually paid to the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Hull), also increased but with less magnitude.