Roivant Sciences Ltd
2 nominees · 3 ballot items.
Three management proposals: (1) Elect two Class II directors (Daniel Gold and Meghan FitzGerald) for three-year terms, (2) Ratify appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accounting firm and appoint EY for statutory purposes for fiscal 2027 and authorize Board/Audit Committee to set remuneration, and (3) Non-binding, advisory “Say-on-Pay” vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.
On the ballot3
- 1
Election of Directors
ManagementBoard: FORElect two (2) Class II directors, Daniel Gold and Meghan FitzGerald, each to serve three-year terms expiring following the annual general meeting after the fiscal year ending March 31, 2029.
- 2
Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
ManagementBoard: FORRatify Ernst & Young LLP as Roivant’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2027, appoint EY as auditor for statutory purposes under the Bermuda Companies Act for fiscal 2027, and authorize the Board, through the Audit Committee, to set EY’s remuneration.
- 3
Non-Binding, Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay
ManagementBoard: FORNon-binding, advisory vote to approve, on a non-binding basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the Proxy Statement.
More detail
This proposal asks shareholders to cast a non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of Roivant’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement. Management seeks this advisory endorsement to demonstrate shareholder support for its compensation framework, which emphasizes a pay-for-performance philosophy combining base salary, annual cash bonuses tied to pre-specified corporate goals, and long-term equity incentives including time‑based RSUs and multi-year PSUs tied to rigorous absolute share-price hurdles. The board has engaged in post-vote shareholder outreach following a lower support level at the prior year’s say-on-pay (60.9% in Fiscal 2024), and management reports having solicited feedback from major institutional holders and incorporated stakeholder views into ongoing compensation governance. Notably, the Senior Executive Compensation Program grants substantial PSUs to senior executives that vest only upon satisfaction of demanding 30‑day VWAP share-price thresholds over a multi-year performance period and include service and post‑vesting holding requirements, increasing alignment of senior pay with sustained shareholder returns. The Compensation Committee also emphasizes other governance safeguards — independent committee oversight, use of an independent compensation consultant, clawback policy, and double-trigger change-in-control protections — to mitigate undue risk-taking and retain long‑term incentives. Because the vote is advisory, it will not bind the board, but the board has stated it will consider the outcome when shaping future pay decisions; the Board recommends FOR to signal that the program aligns executive and shareholder interests in the context of recent strong share‑price performance and transacted milestones. Investors evaluating this proposal should weigh the structural alignment (rigorous PSU hurdles and multi-year RSUs) and shareholder engagement efforts against concerns about front-loaded multi-year awards and the magnitude of potential payouts under extraordinary share-price appreciation scenarios. Overall, the proposal reflects management’s argument that compensation is tied to creating durable shareholder value and that the board’s recommendation seeks to confirm shareholder assent to that approach.
Nominees on the ballot2
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MORGAN STANLEY | 6.7% | 48,239,361 | $1.3B |
| 2 | FMR LLC | 6.6% | 47,324,474 | $1.3B |
| 3 | FMR LLC | 4.2% | 30,466,652 | $844M |
| 4 | BlackRock, Inc. | 3.7% | 26,949,884 | $747M |
| 5 | QVT Financial LPActivist | 3.5% | 25,161,237 | $697M |
| 6 | UBS Group AG | 2.9% | 20,727,487 | $574M |
| 7 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 2.9% | 20,680,572 | $573M |
| 8 | VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 2.8% | 19,838,698 | $550M |
| 9 | STATE STREET CORP | 2.3% | 16,186,613 | $448M |
| 10 | BlackRock, Inc. | 1.8% | 12,949,567 | $359M |
Other Healthcare sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Roivant Sciences Ltd’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Roivant Sciences Ltd 2026 annual meeting?
- Roivant Sciences Ltd (ROIV) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Wednesday, September 16, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Roivant Sciences Ltd 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Roivant Sciences Ltd 2026 meeting is Thursday, July 23, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Roivant Sciences Ltd's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 2 director nominees at the Roivant Sciences Ltd 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Roivant Sciences Ltd 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Roivant Sciences Ltd 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.