Hirequest Inc
6 nominees · 3 ballot items.
Three proposals: (1) elect six directors; (2) ratify Forvis Mazars LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026; and (3) approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (say-on-pay).
Follow how the vote landed and what changed on Hirequest Inc’s board — director track records, governance grades, and ongoing monitoring — on the Boardroom Alpha platform.
On the ballot3
- 1
Election of Directors
ManagementBoard: FORElect six director nominees (Richard F. Hermanns, R. Rimmy Malhotra, Lawrence F. Hagenbuch, Kathleen Shanahan, Edward Jackson, and Jack Olmstead) to serve until the next annual meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.
- 2
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
ManagementBoard: FORRatify the appointment of Forvis Mazars LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.
- 3
Approval of Advisory Resolution on Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay
ManagementBoard: FORAdvisory (non-binding) approval of the compensation paid to the Company’s Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the proxy statement, including compensation tables and narrative disclosure.
More detail
This proposal asks stockholders to cast a non-binding, advisory vote approving the compensation disclosed for the Company’s Named Executive Officers. Management is seeking shareholder approval to confirm that its compensation design — overseen by the Compensation Committee — is aligned with HireQuest’s business objectives, incentivizes both short- and long-term profitable growth, and is consistent with stockholder interests. The proxy discloses that the Compensation Committee sets pay with an emphasis on bonuses, equity awards, and performance measures, and that beginning in 2026 the Committee shifted emphasis toward Adjusted EBITDA as a key metric for the CEO’s compensation. The Board recommends a FOR vote and frames the advisory vote as a means to solicit shareholder feedback, while noting the vote is non-binding and will not itself change compensation arrangements. The Company states it will consider the vote outcome in future compensation design and engage with stockholders if broadly held concerns emerge. From a governance perspective, the CEO also serves as Chairman and is a significant stockholder, and the compensation program includes employment agreements and restricted equity grants (recently granted) that materially affect pay outcomes and vesting treatment in termination or change-of-control scenarios — factors that investors often evaluate when assessing pay-for-performance alignment and potential entrenchment. The advisory nature of the vote means a strong shareholder rejection would be a signaling event prompting further engagement and potential changes by the Compensation Committee, whereas an affirmative vote provides management with validation for its current program. Analysts should weigh the disclosed compensation metrics, the recent contractual changes (e.g., bonus formulas and equity grant timing), and the Committee’s stated intent to link pay more closely to Adjusted EBITDA when assessing whether pay is appropriately aligned with long-term stockholder value creation.
Nominees on the ballot6
Top institutional holders10
| # | Owner | % of shares | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bandera Partners LLC | 1.7% | 236,847 | $3M |
| 2 | VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 1.7% | 234,317 | $3M |
| 3 | BlackRock, Inc. | 1.3% | 178,807 | $2M |
| 4 | GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC | 0.9% | 124,447 | $2M |
| 5 | NewEdge Wealth, LLC | 0.7% | 93,036 | $1M |
| 6 | STATE STREET CORP | 0.5% | 75,466 | $948K |
| 7 | Summit Trail Advisors, LLC | 0.5% | 62,672 | $787K |
| 8 | BlackRock, Inc. | 0.4% | 61,748 | $776K |
| 9 | NORTHERN TRUST CORP | 0.3% | 42,734 | $537K |
| 10 | VANGUARD FIDUCIARY TRUST CO | 0.3% | 40,465 | $508K |
Other Industrials sector meetings6
Upcoming shareholder meetings at Hirequest Inc’s closest sector peers — compare boards, ballots, and ownership across the cohort.
Frequently asked questions
- When is the Hirequest Inc 2026 annual meeting?
- Hirequest Inc (HQI) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on Thursday, June 18, 2026.
- What is the record date for the Hirequest Inc 2026 meeting?
- The record date for the Hirequest Inc 2026 meeting is Tuesday, April 28, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
- Who are the director nominees for Hirequest Inc's 2026 meeting?
- The board is presenting 6 director nominees at the Hirequest Inc 2026 meeting, listed with their independence status and background.
- What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Hirequest Inc 2026 meeting?
- Shareholders will vote on 3 proposals at the Hirequest Inc 2026 meeting, each tagged with who proposed it and the board's recommendation.
The opinions and information contained herein have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Boardroom Alpha cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based thereon.
This report contains opinions and is provided for informational purposes only – it does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. You should not rely solely upon the research herein for purposes of transacting securities or other investments, and you are encouraged to conduct your own research and due diligence, and to seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before you make any investment.
None of the information contained in this report constitutes, or is intended to constitute a recommendation by Boardroom Alpha of any particular security or trading strategy or a determination by Boardroom Alpha that any security or trading strategy is suitable for any specific person. To the extent any of the information contained herein may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made on behalf of Boardroom Alpha as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Boardroom Alpha does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on all or any part of this research and any liability is expressly disclaimed.